Computer Science based physics research?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential intersection of computer science and physics, specifically regarding the manipulation of gravity and weather systems. Participants explore the idea of using directed programmatic control and energy to influence physical constants and variables, as well as the implications for space travel and commercialization.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about research on controlling gravity and weather systems through computer science, suggesting that both the U.S. and China have explored resonant frequency methods for weather manipulation beyond traditional cloud seeding.
  • The same participant proposes that if we are within a simulation, computer scientists could test methods to manipulate gravitational constants, potentially leading to revolutionary advancements in space travel.
  • Another participant dismisses the initial inquiry as lacking scientific credibility, labeling it as a combination of conspiracy theories and speculative ideas about simulation and space travel.
  • A third participant humorously comments on the reliability of information found online, referencing a supposed law about the truthfulness of internet content.
  • A fourth participant expresses support for the original poster's curiosity and encourages scientifically minded discussions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of skepticism and support. While one participant is curious about the research possibilities, others challenge the validity of the claims and ideas presented, indicating a lack of consensus on the topic.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes speculative ideas that rely on unverified assumptions about simulation theory and the feasibility of manipulating physical constants, which remain unresolved.

universalbri
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know of any research being done to control gravity and weather systems through computer science and directed programmatic control leveraging energy?

There's a rumor on the 'internets' (as Bush would call it) that the senate recently discussed openly that HAARP and weather manipulation is real. It sounds conspiratorial, but I do know China and the United States both had similar programs which were working with resonant frequency to control weather (rather than cloud seeding)
http://www.zengardner.com/air-force-admits-weather-control-via-haarp-new-tech/

But seeing as PI and the speed of light are often referred to as 'constants', I think it behooves science to not just test if we're within a simulation, but work with computer scientists assuming we are and testing out different methods of gravitational and holistic system manipulation through computer science.

I am just curious - does anyone knows of any research and theorizing./testing being done to actually 'interact' with these variables and constants in the physical universe through energy and to attempt to alter them?

Why? I would imagine the financial cost benefit and potential for commercialization of space would decrease the cost to almost nil for a space faring vessel when there stands a chance it could defy physics and gravity by having its gravity 'constant' altered to '0' from 9.8 m/s, thus causing leviitation - which would be amazingly cool.

Anyone know of any such research?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Congratulations, you win this week's award for crackpot creativity. You may be the first person ever to combine 'we are living in a simulation' with 'easy space travel through new physics' to arrive at the idea 'let's go to space cheaply by hacking the simulation'.

If we're living in the Matrix, why don't you just try to wake up and find out what the real world outside the simulation is like?

This thread will be deleted soon. But maybe you could try vixra.freeforums.org
 
And everybody knows, you can't put something on the internets if it isn't true. That's the First Law of the World Wide Web.
 
Kudos for your scientifically minded and supportive responses! Enjoy!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Physics Looking to transition from data science to computational physics
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Other Is physics, computer science, or engineering the right path for me?
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
Which MSc to do after BSc physics if you love to code?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Other I need career advice please -- Computer Science vs. Physics
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
Other How hard is it to get into a CS PhD compared to physics?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Graduate MOND Theory Primer: Stacy McGaugh's Research Program Explored
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Computational Neuroscience/BCI Research Career (Advice Needed :S )
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Physics Master's degree: Computational Science vs. Artificial Intelligence?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Admissions How to prove Physics competency to grad school admission committees?
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Schools Can I Do Research in CS for My Physics Major?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K