Computing Curvature: 2D Plane & Axi-Symmetric Surfaces

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rsq_a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the derivation and understanding of curvature expressions for a 2D plane curve and an axi-symmetric surface in 3D. The curvature for a plane curve is expressed as \(\kappa = -\frac{d( \cos\beta)}{dy}\) and relates to the slope angle \(\beta\) through the equation \(\frac{dh}{dy} = \frac{1}{\tan \beta}\). For the axi-symmetric surface, the mean curvature is given by \(\kappa = (S_z^2 + S_r^2)^{-3/2} \left[ S_z^2 S_{rr} - 2S_z S_r S_{rz} + S_r^2 S_{zz} + r^{-1} S_r(S_r^2 + S_z^2)\right]\). The discussion seeks clarification on transitioning from standard definitions to these specific expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of curvature in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and parametric curves
  • Knowledge of derivatives and their applications in geometry
  • Basic concepts of mean curvature and surface analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of curvature formulas in differential geometry
  • Explore the application of curvature in 3D surfaces using MATLAB or Python
  • Learn about the implications of curvature in physical systems, such as fluid dynamics
  • Investigate advanced topics in curvature, such as Gaussian curvature and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers interested in geometric analysis, particularly those working with curvature in 2D and 3D surfaces.

rsq_a
Messages
103
Reaction score
1
I'm having a really hard time working with non-standard expressions for the curvature. This deals with two expressions for the curvature, one for a 2D plane curve, and the other for an axi-symmetric surface in 3D.

The plane curve

Suppose we have a plane curve given by x = h(y) for both x and y positive. In a paper I'm reading, the author writes:
The surface curvature can be expressed in terms of the slope angle, \beta of the surface as per
<br /> \kappa = -\frac{d( \cos\beta)}{dy}.<br />

The geometrical relation,
<br /> \frac{dh}{dy} = \frac{1}{\tan \beta}<br />

expresses the dependence of h on \beta

The second expression is more or less clear for me (modulo whether it should be negated or not). The first expression is not. How do you go from the standard definition:
<br /> \kappa = \frac{h&#039;&#039;}{(1+(h&#039;)^2)^{3/2}},<br />

to this result?

Surface curvature

This one is from another paper. The author assumes that there is an axi-symmetric surface S(z,r) = 0, which is only a function of z and r in spherical coordinates. He states that the mean curvature is
<br /> \kappa = (S_z^2 +S_r^2)^{-3/2} \left[ S_z^2 S_{rr} - 2S_z S_r S_{rz} + S_r^2 S_{zz} + r^{-1} S_r(S_r^2 + S_z^2)\right].<br />

If we denote the downward angle of the slope at an arbitrary position on the drop surface by \delta, so that
<br /> \cos\delta = \frac{S_z}{\sqrt{S_z^2+S_r^2}} \qquad<br /> \sin\delta = \frac{S_r}{\sqrt{S_z^2+S_r^2}}<br />

then the curvature can be written as
<br /> \kappa = \frac{1}{r} \frac{d}{dr} \left(r \sin\delta\right)<br />

along S = 0

Again, I could really use some help in seeing how these expressions were derived. Or if it's not trivial, perhaps a source where the work is shown.
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K