Computing Expectation values as functions of time.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a particle in an infinite square well, specifically focusing on the initial wave function and its time evolution. Participants are tasked with computing expectation values as functions of time, exploring the implications of the wave function not being an energy eigenfunction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the normalization of the wave function and its representation in terms of energy eigenfunctions. Questions arise regarding the time evolution of expectation values and the necessity of using a Fourier series to express the initial wave function.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of how to express the initial wave function in terms of energy eigenfunctions. Some participants have provided guidance on expanding the wave function and using orthonormality, while others express confusion about the implications for expectation values and the time dependence of the wave function.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of quantum mechanics, particularly the transition from a non-eigenfunction to a representation involving eigenfunctions. There is a recognition of the need for integrals to find coefficients in the expansion, but specific details remain unresolved.

Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


6) A particle in the infinite square well has the initial wave function
Ψ(x,0)= Ax when 0<=x<=a/2
Ψ(x,0)= A(a-x) when a/2<=x<=a

a) Sketch Ψ(x,0), and determine the constant A.
b) Find Ψ(x,t)
c) Compute <x> and <p> as functions of time. Do they oscillate? With what frequency?


Homework Equations



Schrödinger Equation, Equations for expectation values

The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a) wasn't a problem. I solved for the normalization constant A by setting the integral of the norm of the wave function equal to zero.
A = 2 * sqrt(3/a^3)

Part (b) also wasn't a problem as Ψ(x,t)=Ψ(x,0)exp(-iEt/h)

Part (c) confuses me a little. I know how to calculate <x> and <p> using the equations <x> = ∫ψ*(x)xψ(x)dx and <p> = ∫ψ*(x)(h/i)d/dx(ψ(x))dx. But the as functions of time confuses me. Won't the exp(-iEt/h) cancel out when multiplied by its conjugate. If this is true, then how can <x> and <p> oscillate? How could they oscillate with any frequency? Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
psi(x,0) is not an energy eigenfunction. So there is no single value of E to use for it. You'll have to represent it as a sum of energy eigenfunctions (a Fourier series) to determine its time evolution.
 
Ok. I wasn't expecting that. I am not sure what you mean. Do you mean a series that looks exp(-iE1t/h) + exp(-iE2t/h) + exp (-iE3t/h) +...
 
What are the eigenfunctions of the infinite square well, and how would you represent your initial function Ψ(x,0) in terms of them?
 
I am not following at all. I don't really know what you are getting at. The only energy eigenfunction I have seen for the infinite square well is E=n^2(pi^2)(h^2)/(2ma^2).
 
Ed Quanta said:
I am not following at all. I don't really know what you are getting at. The only energy eigenfunction I have seen for the infinite square well is E=n^2(pi^2)(h^2)/(2ma^2).

Those are the energies which are eigenvalues (of the Hamiltonian). Corresponding to each of those eigenvalue is an eigenfunction. What are they?
 
exp(-iEnt/h)
 
That's only the time dependence. How about the space dependence?
 
Ed Quanta said:
exp(-iEnt/h)

That is just the time dependence. What is the x dependence?
 
  • #10
I think it would be Ψ(x)=Asin(n*pi*x/a)
 
  • #11
Ed Quanta said:
I think it would be Ψ(x)=Asin(n*pi*x/a)

Right. *These* are the energy eigenfunctions, so only these wavefunctions vary in time with an exponential e^{-iE_n t/ \hbar}. You can't stick a time exponential to any function of x!

So first you must expand your wavefunction over those eigenfunctions using orthonormality. If you haven't seen an example of that in class, it will be long to explain and I have to go teach right now. Maybe I can help more later.
 
  • #12
Dick said:
That's only the time dependence. How about the space dependence?

:biggrin: We wrote almost exactly the same sentence! :smile:
 
  • #13
nrqed said:
Right. *These* are the energy eigenfunctions, so only these wavefunctions vary in time with an exponential e^{-iE_n t/ \hbar}. You can't stick a time exponential to any function of x!

So first you must expand your wavefunction over those eigenfunctions using orthonormality. If you haven't seen an example of that in class, it will be long to explain and I have to go teach right now. Maybe I can help more later.

Ok, so what happens to my initial wave function, Ψ(x,0)?
 
  • #14
nrqed said:
:biggrin: We wrote almost exactly the same sentence! :smile:

For that reason, I feel confident you can continue here. I've got to get to work.
 
  • #15
Ed Quanta said:
Ok, so what happens to my initial wave function, Ψ(x,0)?

You have to write
\Psi(x,0) = \sum_n c_n {\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} sin(\frac{n \pi x}{a})
and find the the value of the c_n using orthonormlaity of the sin wavefunctions. Once you have the c_n , plug them back into
\Psi(x,t) = \sum_n c_n {\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} sin(\frac{n \pi x}{a}) e^{-iE_n t/\hbar}
Your answer will have to stay this way..as an infinite sum.

Patrick
 
  • #16
Thanks my main man.
 
  • #17
Ed Quanta said:
Thanks my main man.

You're welcome. The only difficulty is in finding th ec_n which will require doing an integral of the sin wavefunction times your original wavefunction (leaving "n" an arbitrary parameter).

I haven't addressed your question c) though but I have to go.

Best luck

Patrick
 
  • #18
Ok, I think I'm cool with (b). Help with part (c) anyone?
 
  • #19
Ed Quanta said:
Ok, I think I'm cool with (b). Help with part (c) anyone?

I don't see the problem, now that you have the \Psi (x,t).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K