Graduate Computing the pole mass from a given MS mass?

Click For Summary
To compute the pole mass from a given MS mass using Yukawa coupling, one must consider the running of both Yukawa and gauge couplings, as the conversion depends on the chosen renormalization scheme. The discussion highlights that if electroweak couplings are renormalized in the on-shell scheme, the vacuum expectation value (vev) can be treated as mu-independent, allowing for a direct conversion of Yukawa to MS mass. The conversion from MSbar to pole mass can then be applied without concern for the scale, ensuring the final pole mass is independent of mu. The conversation encourages collaboration for further clarification and assistance on the topic. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurate mass calculations in particle physics.
unknown1111
Messages
7
Reaction score
3
Given a Yukawa coupling as a function of scale and a vev, how can I compute the corresponding pole mas?

Understandably most paper explain how from a measured pole mass one can compute the running mass, for example, Eq. 19 here. However I want to compute the pole mass from the running mass. In all formulas I can find the pole mass seems to depend on the scale, although it shouldn't, and thus I'm not sure which value I should use for the scale in the formula...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry for the late reply. Did you ever figure out what to do here?

I had a think about it. I came up with the following:

1) It depends under what your yukawa coupling is running. Are you considering both yukawa and full gauge coupling dependence (g1,g2,gs) in the running y(mu)? Then I think the conversion depends on the choice of renormalisation scheme (all msbar, or part msbar part on-shell scheme).

For example, it could be that you choose to renormalise electroweak couplings/gauge boson masses in the on-shell scheme. Then, the vev should be mu-independent, then you can directly convert the yukawa into the msbar mass using an input value of vev (or eliminating in terms of GFermi or similar).

2) Then you can apply the MSbar -> Mpole conversion according to the equations hepth linked too. Then, the mu-dependence of your answer should be removed in this conversion (i.e. it doesn't matter which scale you do it at) and the answer for the pole mass should not depend on mu.

How far did you get with this? Let me know and I can help farther
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K