Concentration problems (I guess )

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomkeus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concentration
AI Thread Summary
Recent discussions highlight the challenges faced by students in advanced physics courses, particularly regarding exam performance and the impact of clerical errors on grades. One student expressed frustration over scoring 80% on a Quantum Mechanics test due to a missed term in a lengthy equation and failing an Electrodynamics exam after incorrectly setting up equations. These experiences have raised concerns about maintaining a high average for graduate school applications, despite currently holding a 90% average. The student worries that upcoming tests in complex subjects will increase the likelihood of further mistakes.Participants in the discussion shared strategies for managing such difficulties, emphasizing the importance of recognizing one's understanding of the material and the inevitability of occasional poor grades. They suggested that as long as good grades outnumber the bad, graduate school prospects remain strong. The conversation underscores the commonality of these struggles among students and the need for resilience in the face of academic challenges.
tomkeus
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
This week Electrodynamics test, and last week QM test have really made my cup full. Instead of 100% on QM test I scored 80% because I missed one of the terms in a verry verry long equation (some variational problem with verry ugly hamiltonian in cylindrical coordinates) when I was rewriting it from one page of my work to another (you know, when you fill up one page and you have to continue on another) and consequently all my equations further down were wrong. Electrodynamics was even worse. I failed it. One of the problems was relativistic particle in electromagnetic field. Both fields were given along x axis. From some reason, unknown to me, when I was setting up equations of motion I put magnetic field along z-axis. Solution was correct but not for the problem given to me. Another problem involved solving Laplace equation, finding Maxwell tensor and integrating it over some surface (verry exausting job) in order to find some forces. When I was solving Laplace equation one minus sign slipped my attention and domino effect did his job on the rest of the solution. So I had solved correctly only one of three problems and, you know... Problem is that this is happening to me from beggining of my undergrad studies and despite all of my work it is getting no better. Result are grades that could jeopardize my chances to go to graduate studies. I still have arround 90% average but all tests that are comming in this and following year (QFT, Statistical physics-both quantum and classical, particle physicis, mollecule physics, plasma physics, condensed state theory...) all involve long solutions with a lot of calculations and plenty of space for "clerical errors" and will thus, probably result in further reduction of my average. Is there anyone here who had same problem and how did he fight it. Will publishing some papers increase my chances for entering graduate studies? Any advice would be appreciated because I am really desperate and have scheduled test from topology, Hilbert spaces and group theory next week of which I think giving it up because I have lost all will for studying.

P.S. I'm trying as much as I can to keep my english straight so please excuse me for any grammatical and spelling errors.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can always double check before moving on.

When I'm working with something big, I quickly scan through from time to time. I look for common errors, like negative signs, missing constant, etc... things that you can spot easily. Re-solving an integral is not really practical though.
 
I do that too. But every single time I miss something. Sometimes it is insignificant but sometimes it like electrodynamics from above.
 
tomkeus said:
I do that too. But every single time I miss something. Sometimes it is insignificant but sometimes it like electrodynamics from above.

This might sound stupid, but sometimes I do bad too, obviously. :approve:

The thing that works for me is to comfort myself by acknowledging the fact that I do know the material.

Try giving yourself some credit for knowing the stuff, and that you know you know it.

Bad marks come around. As long as good marks come more often, then getting into graduate school won't be a problem.

You have an A average, so you're good to go.
Bad marks come around. As long as good marks come more often, then getting into graduate school won't be a problem.

You have an A average, so your good to go.
 
work backwards
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top