Conceptual difficulty with FP Resonator

AI Thread Summary
In a resonator with two partially transmitting mirrors, exciting it from one end should theoretically produce a characteristic transmission curve at both ends due to the resonant frequency being dependent on the length of the resonator. However, while a 1mW laser entering from the left can result in 1mW output from the right when tuned correctly, the expectation of 0.5mW from each end is complicated by the nature of the reflected signal. The reflection at the left end consists of both the unentered signal and the "leaking" signal from the cavity, which have a defined phase relationship that can lead to cancellations. When the cavity is excited with a pulse and the laser is turned off, both ends become equivalent in terms of output. Overall, the behavior of the resonator is influenced by the dynamics of the laser pumping and the phase relationships of the signals involved.
H_man
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
If we have a resonator composed of 2 partially transmitting mirrors/grids and we excite the resonator from one end, say the left side then on the right we expect to get the characterstic transmission comb and on the left the inverse (1-Transmission) reflection curve.

Whats giving me a headache is this... shouldn't we see the characteristic transmission curve at both ends of the resonator as the frequency that is being built up is dependent upon the length of the resonator not its orientation in space... it shouldn't matter to the resonant wave which direction its going in.

So.. at the left side we'd see reflection curve + half transmission curve and at the right end just half the transmission curve.

Put perhaps slightly more clearly. If we have a 1mW laser going in from the left we are going to get 1mW coming out from the right if the frequency is tuned correctly, but I don't see why we shoudn't get 0.5mW from each end leaving the resonator??

:confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
H_man said:
If we have a 1mW laser going in from the left we are going to get 1mW coming out from the right if the frequency is tuned correctly, but I don't see why we shoudn't get 0.5mW from each end leaving the resonator??:confused:

You should, and this is what happens if you excite the cavity with a pulse, turn off the laser and look at the decay. In this case the two ends are equivalent.

However, as long as you are pumping the cavity with a laser the reflected signal will be composed to two components, the signal that was reflected without entering the cavity +the signal "leaking" out of the the end. As you long as you have a good cavity these two signal will have a extremely well defined phase relationship, meaning they will superimpose in such a way as to cause cancellations etc.
 
Hi f95Toli... thanks, that's very helpful.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top