Conceptual problem involving centripetal accel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the minimum tangential velocity needed for riders to stick to the wall of a rotating amusement park ride, expressed in terms of the radius (R), the coefficient of static friction (μ), and gravitational acceleration (g). The correct formula derived is V = (gR/μ)^(0.5). Participants clarify the forces at play, emphasizing that the frictional force acts vertically to counterbalance weight, while the normal force provides the necessary centripetal force. A common point of confusion is the role of friction, which only affects vertical forces, not horizontal ones. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
physics noob
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
amusement park ride...basically a large cylinder rotating about a vertical axis. when it is spinning fast enough the floor is dropped out and the riders stick to the wall well above the floor. find the minimum Vtangential needed. express answer in terms of R of circle, coefficent of static friction (mew)s and gravitational acell (g)... seems easy right, and it probably is, but i don't know why my answer is not right...btw the correct answer is

V= (gR/mews)^.5

here's what i got so far...

x direction forces) V^2/ (r) * m - static coeff *n = 0

y direction forces) static coeff *n - mg = 0


so mg = sf *n so v^2/ R = g so



V = (g/R)^.5 where does the sfriction coeff come from?!?

i worked backwards and saw that is must have been multiplied by
v^2/R...now why would you do that... thanks in advanced
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well this is actually a 2-D problem, the FBD for the rider should be something as follows.

We have the frictional force upwards, a weight force downwards, and a normal force radially inwards.

Now use sumF = ma

In the vertical direction we have
Friction - Weight = 0
u*N = mg

In the radially inward direction we have

Normal = Centripetal acceleration
N = mv^2/r

thus

u*m*v^2/r = m*g

u*v^2/r = g

v = sqrt(r*g/u)
 
vertically, mg=(mew)*N i.e. equilibrium

horizontally, N= mv^2/r.

i.e. not equilibrium, but rather the normal force provides the centripetal force.

substitute N into above, get V=(g*r/(mew))^0.5.

typically, when someone learns centripetal force for the 1st time, they get confused with the whole forces producing the centripetal force.

centripetal force is the net force acting on the object, it is the sum of all external forces. If this net force is not directed perpendicular to the velocity of the object, then the path is not going to be circular.

the object is not in equilibrium on horizontal plane, but is accelerated.

you need to sit back and think deeply about this.
 
thanks a lot guys,,,, what through me off was i thought there was friction on the horizontal, but it seems it only exists on the vertical forces, i really appreciate the help, this site is amazing... thanks for your time
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top