Conceptual Question about Mechanical Energy

AI Thread Summary
Mechanical energy is not conserved in a head-on collision between two cars of equal mass moving at equal speed, as kinetic energy is transformed into heat and sound, resulting in zero kinetic energy after the collision. Similarly, when a bicycle rider stops pedaling and the bicycle coasts to a stop, mechanical energy is lost due to friction, indicating it is not conserved in this scenario either. While total energy remains conserved in both cases, the mechanical energy specifically does not. The discussion emphasizes the distinction between mechanical energy and total energy conservation. Understanding these principles is crucial in analyzing energy transformations in collisions and motion.
jayadds
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was just wondering, is mechanical energy conserved when two cars of equal mass and moving at equal speed collide head-on and in the process both come to rest?

I'm inclined to say it isn't conserved because kinetic energy is converted into other forms of energy (e.g. heat and sound) during the collision.

And how about when the bicycle rider ceases to pedal and her bicycle coasts along the path until it comes to rest? Is mechanical energy conserved there? I think because of friction, it isn't conserved...

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is not a vector quantity, it's a scalar. Each car has KE before the collision, and after the collision when the dust has settled each can be seen to have zero KE, so there is not much that has been conserved. :wink:


... unless a wheel went into orbit, or something...
 
jayadds said:
Hi,

I was just wondering, is mechanical energy conserved when two cars of equal mass and moving at equal speed collide head-on and in the process both come to rest?

I'm inclined to say it isn't conserved because kinetic energy is converted into other forms of energy (e.g. heat and sound) during the collision.

And how about when the bicycle rider ceases to pedal and her bicycle coasts along the path until it comes to rest? Is mechanical energy conserved there? I think because of friction, it isn't conserved...

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Many thanks.

In the car collision, some's converted into sound, but for the purposes of this discussion, the energy's turned into heat.

Same with the bicycle.

Note that total energy is conserved here, but mechanical energy isn't.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top