Conceptualizing higher dimensions

jasc15
Messages
162
Reaction score
5
Stephen Hawking has said that even he can't comprehend higher than 3 dimensions in any intuitive way, only in a mathematical way. But in the course of studying advanced physics, does your intuitive understanding of higher dimensions grow at all, or do you just rely on the math?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I find that things like Euler's characteristic

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_characteristic

i.e. N = verticies - edges + faces

do more to help me "visualize" higher dimensions than, say, intrinsic curvature. Intrinsic curvature is a way of dealing with curvature without having to visualize it.
 
I'm not sure many people try, but you can in part visualize higher dimensions. It's a little like those "spot the image" things in newspapers where you cross your eyes and a fuzzy colourful image clicks into 3D.

Search Google on Tesseract and Visualize.

http://mrl.nyu.edu/~perlin/demox/Hyper.html
 
one cannot fully understand the higher dimensions or lower dimensions. let try this, imagine that you are in 2nd dimension, not on the paper but an area in space.that mean u can only move forward,backward,left and right.like an ant.can you?or a point in space.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top