Condition for periodicity of linear combination of signals

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the conditions under which a continuous time signal, defined as a linear combination of multiple periodic signals, is itself periodic. Participants explore the relationship between the fundamental periods of the individual signals and the resulting signal.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant poses the question of the condition for periodicity of a linear combination of n periodic signals and requests a proof of the fundamental period of the resulting signal.
  • Another participant suggests that the fundamental period of the combined signal x(t) is the least common multiple of the fundamental periods of the individual signals, provided that certain integer conditions are met.
  • A subsequent participant interprets the integer conditions as indicating the number of wavelengths of each individual signal within the period of the combined signal, seeking confirmation of this understanding.
  • Another participant affirms the correctness of this interpretation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the interpretation of the integer conditions related to the periodicity of the linear combination of signals, but the overall discussion remains focused on exploring the conditions without reaching a definitive conclusion on all aspects.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve potential limitations regarding the assumptions about the nature of the signals or the specific definitions of periodicity applied.

the_amateur
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
What is the condition for the continuous time signal x(t) to be periodic if it is the linear combination of n periodic signals.

where

x(t) = a[itex]_{1}[/itex]x[itex]_{1}[/itex](t)+a[itex]_{2}[/itex]x[itex]_{2}[/itex](t)+a[itex]_{3}[/itex]x[itex]_{3}[/itex](t)+......a[itex]_{n}[/itex]x[itex]_{n}[/itex](t)

where
x[itex]_{i}[/itex](t) is periodic with fundamental period T[itex]_{i}[/itex] [itex]\forall[/itex] i, where i [itex]\in[/itex] [1,n]Also provide the fundamental period of x(t) with a proof. thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let the fundamental period of [itex]x(t)[/itex] be [itex]T[/itex] such that [itex]x(t)=x(t+T)[/itex]. Then

[itex]x(t+T)=a_1x_1(t+T) + a_2x_2(t+T) + \ldots + a_nx_n(t+T)[/itex]
[itex]=a_1x_1(t+k_1T_1) + a_2x_2(t+k_2T_2) + \ldots + a_nx_n(t+k_nT_n) = x(t)[/itex].

Hence, [itex]x(t)[/itex] is periodic with the period [itex]T[/itex] only if [itex]k_1, k_2, \ldots k_n[/itex] are some integers. Then, since we have

[itex]T=k_1T_1 = k_2T_2 = \ldots = k_nT_n[/itex],

the fundamental period of [itex]x(t)[/itex], [itex]T[/itex], is the least common multiple of [itex]T_1, T_2, \ldots, T_n[/itex].
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the answer!

I guess here k[itex]_{i}[/itex] indicates the number of wavelengths of x[itex]_{i}[/itex](t) in the time period T of x(t).So it has to be an integer as only then x(t) can be periodic.

Please correct me if i am wrong.
 
Your guess is correct.
 
thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K