Conditional Multinomial Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter FaradayLaws
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditional
FaradayLaws
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
If Y1,Y2,Y2 ~ Multinomial with parameter (n,p1,p2,p3)
Prove that the conditional distribution of Y1 given Y3=m (m<n)
is a binomial with ( (n-m), p1/(p1+p2) )

p1+p2+p3=1
y1+y2+y3=n
y3=m

My Attempt:
P( Y1=y1| y3=m) = P(Y1=y1, Y3=m)/ P(Y3=m)

( n choose m and y1 ) p1^y1*p3^m / ( n choose m) p3^m*(p1+p2)^n-m

leaving me with
(n-m)!/ y1! (p1/ p1+p2)^y1((p1+p2) ^y2))
...
can't seem to simplyfy this to become a binomial
honestly stuck here!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(n choose m)(n-m choose y1) p1^y1*p2^(n-m-y1)*p3^m
divided by
(n choose m) p3^m*(p1+p2)^(n-m)

simplifies to

(n-m choose y1)p1^y1 p2^(n-m-y1) (p1 + p2)^(m - n). Rearrange to obtain the result.
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top