I Confidence Intervals for Proportions, n<30

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter WWGD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    intervals
AI Thread Summary
Finding confidence intervals for population proportions with small sample sizes (n<30) can be challenging. The discussion suggests using the binomial distribution to calculate one-sided upper-tail confidence intervals. Specifically, the equation B^p_n(k-1)=1-α is proposed to determine the population proportion. This approach follows similar logic to larger sample confidence intervals, where normal approximations are applicable. Overall, the binomial distribution provides a viable method for estimating confidence intervals in small samples.
WWGD
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
7,701
Reaction score
12,759
Hi All,
I am having trouble finding a good ref. for finding confidence intervals for population proportions
for small sample sizes; n<30. I have seen suggestions to use simulations, t-distributions, etc. .
Any ref. , please?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No refs I'm afraid, but what about using the binomial distribution?

To get a ##\alpha##-quantile one-sided upper-tail confidence interval for the proportion of a population with property X when we have observed k data with the property in a sample of n, we could solve for ##p## the equation:

$$B^p_n(k-1)=1-\alpha$$

where ##B^p_n## is the cdf of a binomial distribution with parameters ##p,n##.

Then, if the population proportion with property X is ##p##, the probability of observing ##k## or more data with the property in a sample of size ##n## is ##\alpha##.

This is just trying to follow the same logic that I think I recall is used to set conf interval limits for larger samples, where a normal approximation can be used for the distribution of the proportion in the sample.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
Thanks,this works, I was thinking something along this lines but the person who asked me just wanted refs.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Back
Top