Confirming Conservation of Kinetic Energy: An Explanation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of kinetic energy during completely inelastic collisions, specifically addressing the validity of options A and D in a physics problem. Participants confirm that translational kinetic energy is not conserved, as illustrated by the example of two clay balls colliding and coming to rest, resulting in zero final kinetic energy. The correct interpretation of the problem indicates that while momentum is conserved, kinetic energy is not, leading to the conclusion that Option D is consistent with the principles of momentum conservation despite the loss of kinetic energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy formulas, specifically 1/2 * mv^2
  • Knowledge of conservation of momentum principles in collisions
  • Familiarity with completely inelastic collision characteristics
  • Basic grasp of translational versus rotational kinetic energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of inelastic collisions in physics
  • Learn about momentum conservation in two-body collisions
  • Explore the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Investigate real-world applications of kinetic energy conservation in mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of kinetic energy and momentum in collisions.

hidemi
Messages
206
Reaction score
36
Homework Statement
For a completely inelastic two-body collision the kinetic energy retained by the objects is the same as:

A) the total kinetic energy before the collision
B) the kinetic energy of the more massive body before the collision
C) the kinetic energy of the less massive body before the collision
D) 1/2 Mv^2, where M is the total mass and v_com is the velocity of the center of mass
E) the difference in the kinetic energies of the objects before the collision

The answer is D
Relevant Equations
KE = 1/2 *MV^2
D is correct, the reasoning is as follows:
1/2*(M1V1)^2 + 1/2*(M2V2)^2 = 1/2 * (M1 + M2) (Vcm)^2, since V1 =V2 =Vcm
KE retained = KE final = 1/2 *M(Vcm)^2
Let me know if reasoning is okay?

However, why A isn't correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hidemi said:
D is correct, the reasoning is as follows:
1/2*(M1V1)^2 + 1/2*(M2V2)^2 = 1/2 * (M1 + M2) (Vcm)^2, since V1 =V2 =Vcm
KE retained = KE final = 1/2 *M(Vcm)^2
Let me know if reasoning is okay?
That reasoning is not OK. You are assuming that the initial KE equals the final KE. But translational KE is not conserved. (Which is also why A is incorrect.)

Here's a simple example to show why that is not the case. Imagine two balls of clay heading toward each other with the same speed and mass. When they collide, assuming a perfectly inelastic collision, what's their final combined speed?
 
Doc Al said:
That reasoning is not OK. You are assuming that the initial KE equals the final KE. But translational KE is not conserved. (Which is also why A is incorrect.)

Here's a simple example to show why that is not the case. Imagine two balls of clay heading toward each other with the same speed and mass. When they collide, assuming a perfectly inelastic collision, what's their final combined speed?
Are the following what you mean?

(A): mv + m (-v) = ( m+m ) v'
v'= o
(D) (1/2 mv^2)*2 = 1/2 (2mv^2)
 
hidemi said:
(A): mv + m (-v) = ( m+m ) v'
v'= o
Assuming you are talking about the example I gave, then yes: Conservation of momentum (which applies in any collision) shows that the final speed of the clay is zero. (Not sure why you labeled it "A".)

hidemi said:
(D) (1/2 mv^2)*2 = 1/2 (2mv^2)
Not sure what you mean here. In my example, the final KE must be zero, since the final speed is zero. The initial KE is certainly not zero. KE is clearly not conserved in that collision.
 
Doc Al said:
Assuming you are talking about the example I gave, then yes: Conservation of momentum (which applies in any collision) shows that the final speed of the clay is zero. (Not sure why you labeled it "A".)Not sure what you mean here. In my example, the final KE must be zero, since the final speed is zero. The initial KE is certainly not zero. KE is clearly not conserved in that collision.
Sorry for the confusion. Thanks for confirming Option (A).
As for Option (D) being the correct answer, does that contradict with the given answer that the KEs of initial and final are not conserved?
 
hidemi said:
Thanks for confirming Option (A).
Just to be clear, I confirmed that Option (A) is incorrect. :smile:

hidemi said:
As for Option (D) being the correct answer, does that contradict with the given answer that the KEs of initial and final are not conserved?
Option (D) is perfectly consistent with KE not being conserved. Note that they are just asking for the final KE, which you can get from conservation of momentum. And that final KE is given in Option (D).
 
Doc Al said:
Here's a simple example to show why that is not the case. Imagine two balls of clay heading toward each other with the same speed and mass. When they collide, assuming a perfectly inelastic collision, what's their final combined speed?
If I use the example you gave previously for option (D),
then KE initial = 1/2*mv^2 + 1/2*m(-v)^2, while KE final (or, retained) = 1/2 * (2m)v'^2, where v'=0.
Therefore, the retained kinetic energy isn't equal to 1/2*mv^2, but 0.

I'm not sure if I misused your given example for Option (D). However, I now understand Option (A) and thanks again for the confirmation.
 
hidemi said:
If I use the example you gave previously for option (D),
then KE initial = 1/2*mv^2 + 1/2*m(-v)^2, while KE final (or, retained) = 1/2 * (2m)v'^2, where v'=0.
Therefore, the retained kinetic energy isn't equal to 1/2*mv^2, but 0.
Good.
 
Doc Al said:
Good.
With what I said in post #7, does that make Option (D) the given answer incorrect?
 
  • #10
hidemi said:
With what I said in post #7, does that make Option (D) the given answer incorrect?
No. Why would you think that?

In post #7, you are discussing my example. But even in that example, Option (D) is still correct. In my example, V_com = 0, so the final KE = 1/2(M)(V_com)^2 = 0. But Option (D) still applies, as it must for any completely inelastic collision.
 
  • #11
Doc Al said:
No. Why would you think that?

In post #7, you are discussing my example. But even in that example, Option (D) is still correct. In my example, V_com = 0, so the final KE = 1/2(M)(V_com)^2 = 0. But Option (D) still applies, as it must for any completely inelastic collision.
Ok I see. Thanks.
 
  • #12
None of the options is true in general.
Option D is correct if the collision is a coalescence. More generally, it could be a glancing blow, in which case it is ##\frac 12Mv^2##, where v is the component of ##v_{com}## along the line of mass centres at collision.
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
None of the options is true in general.
Option D is correct if the collision is a coalescence. More generally, it could be a glancing blow, in which case it is ##\frac 12Mv^2##, where v is the component of ##v_{com}## along the line of mass centres at collision.

But the problem says... "completely inelastic"...
hidemi said:
Homework Statement:: For a completely inelastic two-body collision the kinetic energy retained by the objects is the same as:
 
  • #14
'D' makes no allowance for RE, but it's the definition for (translational) kinetic energy.

f) none of the above.
 
  • #15
robphy said:
But the problem says... "completely inelastic"...
What I described involves no elasticity.
From https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inelastic_collision:
"For two- and three-dimensional collisions the velocities in these formulas are the components perpendicular to the tangent line/plane at the point of contact."
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K