I Confused about a matrix element

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Malamala
  • Start date Start date
Malamala
Messages
345
Reaction score
28
Hello! My questions is in the context of a matrix element in a diatomic molecule. I will rephrase it as well as I can to remove any non needed complexity. I denote the sperical harmonic ##Y_m^l = |m,l>##. I have the operators ##n_{0} = Y_1^0## and ##n_{\pm 1} = Y_1^{\pm 1}##. I also define the operator ##\mathbf{N}## which is the raising/lowering operators for ##|m,l>##. For example, ##N_+|m,l>\propto |m,l+1>## (the prefactors don't matter for my question). Now, I build the operator ##H = i(n_+N_- + n_-N_+)##. If I calculate the matrix element ##<0,0|n_+N_- + n_-N_+|1,0> = <0,0|n-|1,1> + <0,0|n+|1,-1> = 2<0,0|n+|1,-1> ##, which is some non-zero value. However, if I calculate ##<1,0|n_+N_- + n_-N_+|0,0>## I get zero, simply because ##N_{\pm 1} = |0,0> = 0##. What am I doing wrong? This is a Hermitian operator so the 2 matrix elements should be the same. What am I missing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Malamala said:
This is a Hermitian operator so the 2 matrix elements should be the same. What am I missing?
Your operator ##H=i(n_+ N_- + n_- N_+)## is not Hermitian. This is because the ''raising/lowering'' operators ##N_\pm## act on the spherical harmonics, and since your ##n_0## and ##n_\pm## are spherical harmonics themselves, the operators ##N_\pm## do not commute with ##n_0## and ##n_\pm## . Compute ##H^\dagger## to see this.

More importantly, you did not specify what you mean by ##l## and ##m## in your question. However, the standard convention found throughout the literature is that, rather, ##l## denotes the angular momentum quantum number while ##m## is the angular momentum projection quantum number (the projection onto some "Z-axis"). The spherical harmonics, which I will denote as ##Y_{l,m} \equiv |l,m\rangle##, are the eigenfunctions of the angular momentum operators: ##\mathbf{L}^2## and ##L_z##. Now, both of these operators commute with the Hamiltonian of, e.g., the hydrogen atom. But if you are interested in diatomic molecules:
Malamala said:
My questions is in the context of a matrix element in a diatomic molecule.
then you must remember that ##\mathbf{L}^2## do not commute with the molecular Hamiltonian (only the operator ##L_z## does). So for a diatomic molecule, you do not even have a well-defined notion of a quantum number ##l## ##-## assuming, of course, that you are referring in your question to the orbital anguar momentum of the molecular electrons. If this is the case, then the "raising/lowering" operators do not act in a way that you assumed in your question (the result is not a proportionality, which you denoted by "##\propto##").
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top