Confused about Math Conversion: Nano and Micro

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around converting measurements from scientific notation to nanofarads (nF) and microfarads (μF). The calculations provided show that 1.67531519 x 10^-8 converts to approximately 17 nF, while 1.515761363 x 10^-10 converts to about 0.15 nF and 0.00015157 μF. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding decimal movement in conversions, noting that larger units move left and smaller units move right. A cautionary tale highlights the potential consequences of conversion errors, such as failing tests or causing satellite malfunctions. Mastery of these conversions is deemed essential for accuracy in practical applications.
onceinalifetim
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
hello

i need some help and am confuse about it now..

after calculating the math.. 1.67531519 x 10 power of negative 8.. if i change to nano it is 16nf?

1.515761363 x 10 power of negative 10, if i change to nano is 15nf?

what about changing to miro? confuse with the 10 power of negative 8 and 10...

hope help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.67531519 x 10^-8 = 16.7531519 x 10^-9 =17nF (rounded up)

1.515761363 x 10^-10 = 0.1515761363 x 10^-9 = 0.15 nF (rounded down)

1.515761363 x 10^-10 = 0.00015157 x 10^-6 = 0.00015157 uF

You had better practice this before test time until it's second nature. Count the number of times that you move the decimal point left and right. Larger units are to the left and smaller units are to the right.

I failed a test miserably once because an Angstrom is 10^-10 meters and not 10^-9 meters as I was using it. I deserved it though. Conversion problems cause satellites to crash.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K