Confused about relativity and a train

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of relativity, specifically the behavior of light signals in different reference frames, as illustrated by a scenario involving a train and synchronized clocks. Participants are exploring the implications of simultaneity and the effects of relative motion on the perception of time between observers in different frames.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the timing of light reaching clocks at the front and rear of a moving train, questioning why the rear clock shows a higher reading than the front clock. They explore the implications of simultaneity in different reference frames and how light pulses emitted from the center of the train are perceived differently by observers on the ground.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between simultaneity in the train frame and the ground frame. Some participants suggest that the clocks start at the same time in the train frame, while others note that the rear clock appears to start first in the ground frame. The discussion is active, with participants reflecting on their understanding and clarifying their thoughts about the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the definitions of simultaneity and synchronization across different reference frames. The discussion includes references to equations and concepts from relativity, indicating a need for further clarification on these principles.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
Two clocks are positioned at the ends of a train
of length L (as measured in its own frame). They are synchronized in the train frame.
The train travels past you at speed v. It turns out that if you observe the clocks at
simultaneous times in your frame, you will see the rear clock showing a higher reading
than the front clock (see Fig. 11.6). By how much?
Relevant Equations
\n
We can find the difference of time to light reach both clocks, it should be Lv/c², what i am confused is why the rear clock show a higher reading of the front clock.
Ok, the light take longer time to travel and reach the rear clock, and here is the thing!
What i am interpreting is: When the light reach the clock, it "starts to" run, to read the same hours as a clock localized on the source emissor of light.
So, for example: The light reach the front clock, so it start: 0s, 1s, 2s. And so the light reach the rear, and just now it starts: 0s...
That is, the front clock has a higher reading than the rear, but why is this wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Say LED at the center of the train emit light pulses every second. There are counters at front and rear ends. The both counts increase simultaneously in the train FR. However, in the ground FR, light reaches earlier to the rear end because the rear end intercept the pulses. The front end escapes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist
anuttarasammyak said:
Say LED at the center of the train emit light pulse every second. The pulses are counted at front and rear ends. The counts are simultaneous in the train FR. However light reaches earlier to the rear end because rear end encounter the pulses in the ground FR. This is the reason of higher reading.

They need to be simultaneous in our frame, no?. So it need to be
$$df+dr=L$$
$$\frac {df}{c-v}=\frac {dr}{c+v} (*)$$
$$df+df\frac{c+v}{c-v}=L$$
$$2cdf=L(c-v)$$
$$df=\frac{L(c-v)}{2c}$$ (Taking the result from RossMilikan, which was equal to my solution anyway...)

I put (*), it is this equation which implies simultaneous in our frame.
So in the train frame, the light will end taking more time to reach the rear end

This is confused
 
LCSphysicist said:
They need to be simultaneous in our frame, no?. So it need to be
$$df+dr=L$$
$$\frac {df}{c-v}=\frac {dr}{c+v} (*)$$
$$df+df\frac{c+v}{c-v}=L$$
$$2cdf=L(c-v)$$
$$df=\frac{L(c-v)}{2c}$$ (Taking the result from RossMilikan, which was equal to my solution anyway...)

I put (*), it is this equation which implies simultaneous in our frame.
So in the train frame, the light will end taking more time to reach the rear end

This is confused
It's elementary, surely, that light emitted from the centre of the train will:

a) Reach each end of the train at the same time in the train frame;

b) Reach the rear of the train first in the ground frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist
You could also note that the clocks, when observed in the lab frame at time ##t##, will display times ##t' = \gamma(t-\frac{xv}{c^2})## which will differ by ##\Delta t' = -\frac{Lv}{c^2}## where ##L = \gamma \Delta x = \Delta x'##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist
I believe i am confusing simultaneously in ground reference and synchronized in train frame. I will take more time to think bout it.
 
LCSphysicist said:
I believe i am confusing simultaneously in ground reference and synchronized in train frame. I will take more time to think bout it.
Okay, but if the light pulse is used to start the clocks running then:

a) They start at the same time in the train frame;

b) The rear clock starts first in the ground frame.

Therefore, "the leading clock lags".
 
LCSphysicist said:
I believe i am confusing simultaneously in ground reference and synchronized in train frame. I will take more time to think bout it.
Two clocks synchronized by a light pulse in the "train frame":
synch1.gif

The same clocks according to the ground frame,
synch2.gif

Trailing clock starts first.

P.S. Time dilation and Length contraction not accounted for in these animations.)
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist, etotheipi and PeroK

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K