Confusing circuit analysis question

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
anon6912
Messages
21
Reaction score
3
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no Homework Template is shown
Hi

I have the following situation:
(Please see attached pic)
undefined.jpg


I want to know if equation (4) i have written is correct.

What is confusing me is that, I remember being told in circuit analysis that each energy storage element should have its own state variable.

But in this situation when I apply KCL at node 1 and using that relationship I am seemingly able to write iL in terms of the other two variables.

I can apply KCL there can't I?
and if I can apply KCL at that node then I can get il = ig + is?
then I can substitute this result in eq1 to get eq4?

But this seems to violate what I have learned in class of each energy storage element needing its own state variable.

Any help is much appreciated.

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180716_102122818_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20180716_102122818_HDR.jpg
    26.2 KB · Views: 561
Last edited:
on Phys.org
if we consider the current through each energy storing element as its state variable then I don't see what it is that bothers you.

Each element having its own state variable, doesn't necessarily mean that the state variables of various elements are independent from each other, the elements interact with each other with various ways when they are connected in a circuit in various ways, so their states become dependent from each other, so the state variables become dependent from each other as well.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anon6912
Thank you. That clarified my doubt
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2