Suppose you start with a system of N particles identified by position vectors [itex]r_1, r_2, \ldots, r_N[/itex] and masses [itex]\mu_1, \mu_2, \ldots, \mu_N[/itex]. Then (quantum mechanically) the kinetic energy operator for this system is given by (assuming [itex]\hbar = 1[/itex])(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]

T = \sum_{i = 1}^N -\frac{\Delta_i}{2\mu_i},

[/tex]

where [itex]\Delta_i = \Delta_{r_i}[/itex] is the Laplacian in the variable [itex]r_i[/itex]. Now, let's make the change of variables [itex]\eta_i = r_i - r_N[/itex]. According to the book I have, the kinetic energy in the new variables looks like

[tex]

T' = \sum_{i = 1}^{N-1} -\frac{\Delta_i}{2\mu_i'} + \sum_{i < j} \nabla_i \cdot \nabla_j,

[/tex]

where [itex]\Delta_i = \Delta_{\eta_i}[/itex], [itex]\nabla_i = \nabla_{\eta_i}[/itex], and

[tex]

\frac{1}{\mu'_i} = \frac{1}{\mu_i} + \frac{1}{\mu_N}.

[/tex]

I simply do not see how this is true. It seems that, if one applied the chain rule, one obtains [itex]\Delta_{\eta_i} = \Delta_{r_i}[/itex]; is that not true?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Confusing variable change calculation

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Confusing variable change |
---|

Confusion about the "now-you-see-me-now-you-don't" radian |

I Function of 2 variables, max/min test, D=0 and linear dependence |

I Differentiate two variables functions |

I Derivative When Substituting Variables |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**