Confusion about the derivation of the speed of sound

In summary, the speed of sound in water is determined by the continuity equation and the wave equation. The continuity equation states that the mass flux through an infinitely thin slice of water is constant, and the wave equation states that the wave velocity is equal to the pressure gradient divided by the density of water.
  • #1
snoopies622
840
28
I've having trouble understanding a derivation of the speed of sound waves, which is actually similar to another derivation I found a couple days ago.

Let's suppose the sound is moving through water in a long cylindrical horizontal pipe. The premises of the derivation are

1.) For a given cylindrical slice of water of thickness [itex] \Delta x [/itex], the net horizontal (direction of the wave motion) force acting on the water is proportional to the hoizontal pressure gradient times [itex] \Delta x [/itex], so [tex] \rho \frac {dv}{dt} = \frac {- \partial P}{\partial x} [/tex]
2.) the mass flux through any infinitely thin cylindrical slice is constant, or
[tex] \frac {d ( \rho v) }{dt} =0 [/tex]

And from these premises one can arrive at [tex] v^2 = \frac {dP }{d \rho } [/tex].

What I don't understand is why the second premise is true, since neither the water density nor water speed is constant. Or perhaps I don't understand the second premise: Is it supposed to be for an infinitely thin slice, or for a cylinder of thickness [itex] \Delta x [/itex], or something else?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For the Wikipedia entry "Speed of sound" they refer to "the two ends of the tube", which seems to me to be a very strange body of fluid to be looking at when the wave itself can be contained within a small fraction of that length.
 

Attachments

  • wave-speed.jpg
    wave-speed.jpg
    42.7 KB · Views: 119
  • #3
What you describe in words as equation 2) would be more like ##d(\rho v) / d x##. But what you state mathematically is that the mass flux doesn't change in time at any point. That is of course weird. Furthermore, these are all partial derivatives since ##v## and ##\rho## are dependent on both time and location. It is however close-ish to the linearized continuity equation:
$$
\frac{\partial\tilde{\rho}}{\partial t} + \rho_0 \frac{\partial \tilde{v}}{\partial x} = 0
$$
If you write ## v = \tilde{v} ##, ##\rho = \rho_0 + \tilde{\rho}## and ##p = p_0 + \tilde{p}## where all quantities with a tilde are small amplitude disturbances. I.e. you can neglect second order terms. This equation simply states that no mass is destroyed, i.e. a density change is compensated with an influx of mass (no 'gaps' in the flow field).

From this equation and your first equation you can derive the wave equation and speed of sound as you stated.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #4
Ah, the continuity equation! Thanks Arjan82, I don't know why neither essay mentioned that. I think that will completely solve my problem.
 
  • #5
I'm puzzled by the derivation in the attachment to #2 too. I think the standard derivation (e.g., Landau Lifshitz vol. 6) is more transparent. All you need to know is that assuming a perfect fluid implies that the thermodynamic changes at any point in the fluid are adiabatic (at constant entropy).

You get sound waves as small perturbations around the static state of the fluid, i.e.,
$$\rho=\rho_0 + \delta \rho, \quad P=P_0 + \delta P, \quad \vec{v}=\delta \vec{v}.$$
Then take Euler's equation (just Newton's law ##F=m a## for an ideal-fluid element):
$$\rho [\partial_t \vec{v} + (\vec{v} \cdot \nabla) \vec{v}]=-\vec{\nabla} P.$$
Now since ##\vec{v}=\delta \vec{v}## we can neglect the 2nd term at the left-hand side and use that ##P_0=\text{const}##, leading to
$$\rho_0 \partial_t \delta \vec{v}=-\vec{\nabla} \delta P. \qquad (1)$$
The continuity equation (mass conservation law) reads
$$\partial_t \rho+\vec{\nabla} \cdot (\rho \vec{v})=0.$$
Now expanding up to the first order in ##\delta \rho## and ##\delta \vec{v}## you get
$$\vec{\nabla} \cdot (\rho \vec{v})=\vec{v} \cdot \vec{\nabla} \rho + \rho \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{V} = \rho_0 \vec{\nabla} \cdot \delta \vec{v}.$$
Thus the continuity equation simplifies to
$$\partial_t \delta \rho + \rho_0 \vec{\nabla} \cdot \delta \vec{v}=0.$$
So taking the divergence of Eq. (1) and using this equation you get
$$\rho_0 \partial_t \vec{\nabla} \cdot \delta \vec{v}=-\partial_t^2 \delta \rho=-\Delta \delta P. \qquad(2)$$
Now you need an equation of state, i.e., ##P=P(\rho)##, where you have to assume the entropy to be constant. Given that equation of state, you get
$$\delta P = \left (\frac{\partial P}{\partial \rho} \right)_{S,0} \delta \rho=:c^2.$$
The notation of the partial derivative means that you have to take the derivative at constant ##S## and for the thermodynamic quantities of the unperturbed fluid in thermal equilibrium. So plugging this into (2) you find
$$\partial_t^2 \delta \rho -c^2 \Delta \delta \rho=0,$$
which is a wave equation for a wave with phase velocity ##c## which thus is the sound velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes Arjan82
  • #6
That is more transparent, thanks vanhees71!
 
  • #7
Just looked at this derivation in Landau & Lifshitz again and wondered why the equation of state looks like $$\delta P = \left (\frac{\partial P}{\partial \rho} \right)_{S,0} \delta \rho$$ Sure, the entropy is constant, but why can you assume the pressure to be only dependent on the density, and not on the temperature, which is surely not constant when the wave passes through.
 
  • #8
Here the internal energy is the natural thermodynamic potential, and you have
$$\mathrm{d} U = T \mathrm{d} S - P \mathrm{d} V = T \mathrm{d} S+P/\rho^2 \mathrm{d} \rho.$$
So you get ##P## as function of ##S## and ##\rho## by
$$P=\rho^2 (\partial_{\rho} U)_{S}.$$
For an ideal fluid all changes are adiabatic, i.e., you have ##\mathrm{d} S=0##. That's why the equation of state is given in the form above.
 
  • Informative
Likes TOAsh2004
  • #9
Thanks a lot, that makes perfect sense.
 

What is the speed of sound?

The speed of sound is the rate at which sound waves travel through a medium. In a vacuum, sound waves cannot travel as there is no medium for them to propagate through. The speed of sound varies depending on the medium it is traveling through, with the highest speed being in solids and the lowest in gases.

How is the speed of sound calculated?

The speed of sound can be calculated using the formula v = √(γRT), where v is the speed of sound, γ is the adiabatic index of the medium, R is the gas constant, and T is the temperature of the medium in Kelvin. This formula is derived from the ideal gas law and assumes an isentropic process.

Why is there confusion about the derivation of the speed of sound?

The confusion about the derivation of the speed of sound is due to the fact that there are different equations and methods used to calculate the speed of sound. Some of these equations are based on ideal gas assumptions, while others take into account the compressibility of the medium. Additionally, there may be discrepancies in the values used for the variables in the equations, leading to varying results.

What factors affect the speed of sound?

The speed of sound is affected by several factors, including the temperature, density, and elasticity of the medium. As the temperature increases, the speed of sound also increases. In denser mediums, such as solids, the speed of sound is higher due to the increased elasticity of the medium. Additionally, the speed of sound is also affected by the presence of wind or other disturbances in the medium.

Why is the speed of sound important to study?

The study of the speed of sound is important in many fields, including acoustics, meteorology, and engineering. Understanding the speed of sound can help in designing efficient and safe structures, predicting weather patterns, and improving communication systems. It is also crucial in fields such as medicine, where the speed of sound is used in diagnostic imaging techniques like ultrasound.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
423
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
24
Views
968
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus
Replies
28
Views
2K
Back
Top