Confusion abt relation betwn time travel and speed of light

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between time travel and the speed of light, specifically within the framework of Special Relativity. It establishes that anything traveling faster than the speed of light theoretically moves back in time, while objects traveling at light speed experience no passage of time. The conversation highlights the distinction between coordinate time and proper time, explaining that a clock moving with a light beam does not age, and thus, time does not advance for it. This leads to the conclusion that approaching light speed allows for significant time dilation, enabling potential time travel into the future.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Special Relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with coordinate time and proper time
  • Knowledge of time dilation effects
  • Basic grasp of light speed limitations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of time dilation in Special Relativity
  • Explore the concept of proper time versus coordinate time in detail
  • Investigate theoretical frameworks for faster-than-light travel
  • Examine the effects of relativistic speeds on aging and time perception
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the theoretical aspects of time travel and the nature of light speed.

aritro88
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i don't know in which section it belongs, so i am putting it here...

according to various theories proposed by various researchers, time travel depends on the speed of light. as far as i have read/heard -
i) anything traveling faster than the speed of light moves back in time.
ii) anything traveling AT the speed of light remains stationary in time.

now my question-
if light is traveling at the speed of light (obviously), then why does it take time to travel?

it (light beam/ray etc) should be stationary in time and should reach the destination the moment it leaves the light source.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The backwards "solutions" are mostly nonsense. There is some sense in which it is true under GR, but it's far more complicated than that. Let's stay in realm of Special Relativity and stick to speeds up to speed of light.

There are two concepts of time in relativity. There is time as a coordinate and there is proper time. You can think of proper time as aging of something. In other words, a clock you carry with you will measure your proper time. Also, the proper time and coordinate time agree for an object that's at rest in your chosen coordinate system.

When we talk about time slowing down for moving objects, we are comparing time in different coordinate systems. Another way to look at it is that we compare proper time measured by two different observers.

Now, if we happen to have a clock moving along with the beam of light, which will measure proper time for that beam of light, in any other frame of reference, that clock will appear to stand still. The proper time does not advance for a system that travels at the speed of light. Such a system does not age.

The connection to time travel is pretty straight forward. If you wanted to see what the world is like thousands of years from now, all you have to do is get up to very near the speed of light. In that case, your proper time advances very little while proper time of the world around you advances a lot. Light speed is just the extreme case, where time for traveler would not advance at all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
969
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K