Confusion in the derivation of the force on a magnetic dipole

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
32 replies · 8K views
wait i was looking through wikipedia and found this
f5d9854a6668509bf50f8d6db476f2c16895ef0c

this seems to suggest
##
(A \cdot \nabla)B
##
is not
##
A \cdot (\nabla B)
##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
timetraveller123 said:
wait i was looking through wikipedia and found this
f5d9854a6668509bf50f8d6db476f2c16895ef0c

this seems to suggest
##
(A \cdot \nabla)B
##
is not
##
A \cdot (\nabla B)
##
Here, the notation ##\nabla B## is not the dyadic formed from ##\nabla## and ##B##. So, here,
##A \cdot (\nabla B) \neq (A \cdot \nabla)B##.

Here, ##\nabla B## is the gradient of the vector B as define at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient#Gradient_of_a_vector
or in (1.14.3) here http://homepages.engineering.auckla...ensors/Vectors_Tensors_14_Tensor_Calculus.pdf

In matrix notation, the gradient of B, ##\nabla B##, as used in the Wikipedia article is the transpose of the matrix representing the dyadic ##\left( \nabla B \right)_{\rm dyadic}##.

See also the thread https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/gradients-of-vectors-and-dyadic-products.139000/​
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timetraveller123
ok thanks again i will look more into the subject