Confusion on the magnitude of magnetic fields

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Ampere's Law in analyzing magnetic fields within a rotating pipe system. Participants clarify that while Ampere's Law indicates that the magnetic field inside a solenoid can be zero, this is not the case for a pipe in rotational motion, which generates a non-zero By component. The confusion arises from the misapplication of Ampere's Law due to the geometry of the chosen loops for analysis. The correct interpretation shows that By can exist even when Bx and Bz are zero, emphasizing the importance of loop orientation in applying Ampere's Law effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Ampere's Law
  • Magnetic Field Theory
  • Understanding of Solenoids
  • Vector Calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Ampere's Law in various geometries
  • Explore the behavior of magnetic fields in rotating systems
  • Learn about the implications of symmetry in magnetic field calculations
  • Investigate the relationship between current direction and magnetic field orientation
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in advanced electromagnetism, particularly in understanding the complexities of magnetic fields in dynamic systems.

Gourab_chill
Messages
55
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
I've put question below.
Relevant Equations
B=µNI; N=no of turns for unit length of solenoid
Capture.PNG

Here, the correct options are A,D.
Solution:
Capture1.PNG

I got A as answer as ∫ B.dl=µI. But, the answer to the question says that it is a solenoid and therefore Bx=0 for point P. Here I'm a bit confused. I know this system resembles a solenoid in some ways, then By must have some finite value, but ampere's law says there should be no magnetic field in the pipe or it's magnitude is zero. Where am I mistaking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you are applying Ampere's law wrongly in the interior of the pipe (probably because you are misconceiving the symmetries present in this system). From Ampere's law we can't deduce that the B-field will be zero inside, not for this system. If the pipe was doing only translational motion then we could deduce that the B-field would be zero inside but because it does rotational motion too around the y-axis, it generates a component ##B_y## in the interior that it isn't zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Delta2 said:
I believe you are applying Ampere's law wrongly in the interior of the pipe (probably because you are misconceiving the symmetries present in this system). From Ampere's law we can't deduce that the B-field will be zero inside, not for this system. If the pipe was doing only translational motion then we could deduce that the B-field would be zero inside but because it does rotational motion too, it generates a component ##B_y## in the interior that it isn't zero.
So, where is exactly ampere's law applicable? If the current is moving around the pipe (due to rotational motion as here), we cannot apply it? Does the current have to be perpendicular to the imaginary circle we consider in ampere's law?
 
Ampere's law is applicable everywhere, I just meant that you apply the law in the wrong way for this system.
Please write a post and explain with as much detail as possible how do you apply Ampere's law for this system so that you infer that ##B_y=B_x=B_z=0## for the interior of the pipe. ##B_x## and ##B_z## are indeed zero but not ##B_y##.
 
Delta2 said:
Ampere's law is applicable everywhere, I just meant that you apply the law in the wrong way for this system.
Please write a post and explain with as much detail as possible how do you apply Ampere's law for this system so that you infer that ##B_y=B_x=B_z=0## for the interior of the pipe. ##B_x## and ##B_z## are indeed zero but not ##B_y##.
All I knew till now is that by applying ampere's law the net magnetic field at a point is zero if it does not encloses any current.
For solenoids as I looked up, the derivation also uses ampere's law, however here the loop encloses current due to it's position which I've tried to show in the first figure. What if we take the loop as in the second figure? The magnetic field should be zero in the second case or is the loop position wrong?
Untitled.png
 
lets focus on the second case. Assume that the B-field has a ##B_y## component (y the axis of the pipe). Do we get any info for this ##B_y## component by applying Ampere's law for the loop shown in the second case? NO we don't because ##B_y## is always perpendicular to the ##dl## of the loop (since the loop lies in the x-z plane) so it is ##\vec{B_y}\cdot \vec{dl}=0## because the dot product is always zero as long as the vectors are perpendicular to each other. ##B_y## might be zero or might be any other value but because its dot product will be zero (for this specific loop we choose to apply the law), amperes law hold. That is Ampere's law hold for any choice of ##B_y## for this specific loop.

If we choose the loop of the first case, then we can extract useful info about ##B_y## (because it is not perpendicular everywhere , it is in the same direction as ##dl## in the segments of the loop that are along the y-axis) by applying ampere's law for this loop.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gourab_chill
Delta2 said:
lets focus on the second case. Assume that the B-field has a ##B_y## component (y the axis of the pipe). Do we get any info for this ##B_y## component by applying Ampere's law for the loop shown in the second case? NO we don't because ##B_y## is always perpendicular to the ##dl## of the loop (since the loop lies in the x-z plane) so it is ##\vec{B_y}\cdot \vec{dl}=0## because the dot product is always zero as long as the vectors are perpendicular to each other. ##B_y## might be zero or might be any other value but because its dot product will be zero (for this specific loop we choose to apply the law), amperes law hold. That is Ampere's law hold for any choice of ##B_y## for this specific loop.

If we choose the loop of the first case, then we can extract useful info about ##B_y## (because it is not perpendicular everywhere , it is in the same direction as ##dl## in the segments of the loop that are along the y-axis) by applying ampere's law for this loop.
Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K