Confusion regarding the Boltzman distribution as it applies to paramagnetism

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between the Boltzmann distribution and paramagnetism in a system of independent magnetic spins. Each spin has potential energy based on its alignment with an external magnetic field, and the Boltzmann distribution is used to calculate the probabilities of these energy states. The confusion arises regarding how the thermal energy from the reservoir influences the spins' states and their resulting magnetization. It is clarified that while temperature affects the fraction of spins in higher energy states, it does not directly cause magnetization; rather, it limits it by promoting thermal agitation. The mechanism by which thermal energy "kicks" spins into higher energy states remains a point of inquiry.
FluxPin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm currently in an introductory thermal physics course, and today we
learned about the Boltzmann factor and how to use it to calculate
various quantities with the corresponding probability distribution. All was going well until we got to the subject of paramagnetism.

We supposed a system of independent magnetic spins, pointing either
parallel or anti-parallel to the Magnetic field given by \vec{B}. In other
words, there are N spins each with magnetic moment \vec{μ} in contact with a
thermal reservoir of temperature T.

I understand that each spin has a potential energy given by
E_{n}=\pm\vec{μ}\vec{B} (A basic E&M result). However, I DON'T really understand how we can relate this
quantity to the Boltzmann distribution: P_{n}= e^(\frac{-E_{n}}{kT})/Z where Z is the partition function which normalizes the distribution.

How can the thermal energy of the reservoir (kT) can be related to the
purely magnetic state of each magnetic spin? I'm clearly missing
something since this makes no sense to me. Is energy also going into
the thermal energy of these spins and we are just not considering it?
I'm quite confused by this concept and any clarification would be most
appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it in the other order: the spins don't determine the reservoir, but rather the reservoir sets the temperature of the magnetic material, allowing you to calculate the magnetization. Electrons can be in two states (aligned and anti-aligned) having energies +/-E_n; the Boltzmann distribution tells you the fractions of total electrons, P_1=N_1/N and P_2=N_2/N, that are in each state. The net magnetization is then
M=N(P_1-P_2)\mu=(N_1-N_2)\mu.
 
I understand that the magnetic moments do not determine the reservoir. What I'm having a conceptual issue with is why the temperature of the magnetic material (which I understand is completely dependent on the reservoir) can be related to its magnetization (i.e. the probability of a moment aligning itself along the field) with the Boltzmann distribution.
marcusl said:
the reservoir sets the temperature of the magnetic material, allowing you to calculate the magnetization.
How does the temperature of the material determine its magnetization?
 
Last edited:
The temperature is not causing the magnetization, it's partially preventing it. If the temperature was absolute zero, all the dipoles would sit happily in the lower energy state and the system would be fully magnetized. Thermal agitation kicks a fraction of them to the higher energy state, reducing the magnetization.
 
Okay, all the dipoles being in their lowest energy level at absolute zero makes. The thing I still don't get is how the thermal energy of the reservoir puts the individual dipoles into their higher energy magnetic state. That is, he mechanism by which they are "kicked" into the higher energy state.
 
Last edited:
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top