Confusion regarding to polar form representation of AC quantity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation of an AC voltage source in polar form, specifically addressing the phase angle of the phasor derived from its rectangular form. Participants explore the implications of using different phase angles in electrical engineering practice.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a phasor in rectangular form and calculates its magnitude and phase angle, noting two possible polar representations.
  • Another participant suggests that from an electrical engineering perspective, the phase angle should be represented starting from the real axis and rotating counter-clockwise, implying a preference for the angle 255.96°.
  • A different participant questions the common practice in electrical engineering literature, noting that many texts restrict phase angles to the interval of -180° to 180°, suggesting a preference for -104.04°.
  • One participant discusses the comparison of phase relationships between waveforms, indicating that angles are typically considered within the ranges of 0 to +180° and 0 to -180°.
  • A later reply expresses gratitude for a resource that clarifies the concept of phase angles in AC circuits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on which phase angle is preferred in practice, with some advocating for 255.96° and others suggesting -104.04° based on common conventions in electrical engineering literature. The discussion remains unresolved regarding a definitive preference.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the mathematical equivalence of both phase angles but highlight the lack of consensus on which is more commonly used in practice, reflecting potential limitations in the literature they have encountered.

mdnazmulh
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I'm sure my question is very simple to most of u guys. But I have the following confusion.
Let's say we have an AC voltage source in a circuit. In rectangular form it's phasor form is
v= -4 - 16 j .
I want to write this phasor in polar form. Well, The phasor is in 3rd quadrant of complex plane.
It's magnitude comes out to be 16.49
For phase angle,
\phi = arctan (-16/-4) = 75.96◦
To shift 75.96 degrees from 1st quadrant to 3rd quadrant I can approach in 2 ways. like
\phi = 75.96+ 180 = 255.96◦
or,
\phi = 75.96- 180 = -104.04◦

Thereby in polar form, v can be written like either v= 16.49\angle255.96 or, v= 16.49\angle-104.04.
From mathematical point of view both the polar forms of v are ok.
My question is that from electrical engineering viewpoint which polar form is to be written i.e. which phase angle is preferred in practice 255.96◦ or -104.04◦?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
mdnazmulh said:
I'm sure my question is very simple to most of u guys. But I have the following confusion.
Let's say we have an AC voltage source in a circuit. In rectangular form it's phasor form is
v= -4 - 16 j .
I want to write this phasor in polar form. Well, The phasor is in 3rd quadrant of complex plane.
It's magnitude comes out to be 16.49
For phase angle,
\phi = arctan (-16/-4) = 75.96◦
To shift 75.96 degrees from 1st quadrant to 3rd quadrant I can approach in 2 ways. like
\phi = 75.96+ 180 = 255.96◦
or,
\phi = 75.96- 180 = -104.04◦

Thereby in polar form, v can be written like either v= 16.49\angle255.96 or, v= 16.49\angle-104.04.
From mathematical point of view both the polar forms of v are ok.
My question is that from electrical engineering viewpoint which polar form is to be written i.e. which phase angle is preferred in practice 255.96◦ or -104.04◦?

From the EE point of view (at least mine), you always picture phase starting at the real axis, and rotating counter-clockwise. So which answer would that give you?
 
From the EE point of view (at least mine), you always picture phase starting at the real axis, and rotating counter-clockwise. So which answer would that give you?
Well according to your statement, I have to prefer 255.96◦ as phase angle of the voltage source. Now the question rises is that phase angle preferred in EE practice?
I had to ask it because so far in those books of EE that I've been studying, I have not seen any AC voltage/current in polar form whose phase angle is that much large like 255.96◦. By the way I'm now at the beginning of 2nd year of EE course. I haven't come across a lot of circuit analysis books in 1st year. Those books I was studying always have kept phase angle of any AC quantity in the interval of -180\leq\phi\leq180. So, if I follow those books then I would have to select -104.04◦.

This thing is confusing me. Mathematically both phase angles' terminating line indicates the same phasor. But I want to know in the practice of electrical engg. field which phase angle is preferred by the engineers?
 
When you are comparing the phase relationship of two waveforms you would normally compare them as 0 to +180 degrees and 0 to -180 degrees.

For example, if a voltage waveform is to the right of the corresponding current in a circuit (as seen on an oscilloscope display), it is said that the current is "lagging " the voltage and this is given a negative angle depending how far out of alignment the two sinewaves are.

See the diagram on the following page:
http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~vawter/PhysicsNet/Topics/ACCircuit/PhaseAngle.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank u so much vk6kro. Your link which explained phase angle in such a simple manner helped me a lot. Thank u again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K