Sinusoids as Phasors, Complex Exp, I&Q and Polar form

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationships between phasors, complex exponentials, and their representations in polar and Cartesian forms. Participants explore the implications of these representations, particularly in the context of trigonometric identities and the behavior of coefficients over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the equivalence of different forms of cosine functions, specifically how A cos(ωt + Φ) can be represented in both polar and Cartesian forms, leading to confusion about constants B and C.
  • Another participant provides a derivation using complex exponentials to show the relationship between A cos(ωt + Φ) and its Cartesian representation, emphasizing the role of trigonometric identities.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of varying coefficients B and C, particularly regarding their ability to represent an arbitrary phase in the resultant expression.
  • There is a discussion about the conditions under which the magnitudes of the left and right sides of the equations match, specifically mentioning that A must equal the square root of the sum of the squares of B and C for equality to hold.
  • Participants express uncertainty about how varying B and C can maintain the phase information in the resultant expression.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views regarding the relationships between the different forms and the implications of varying coefficients. The discussion remains unresolved with ongoing questions about the nature of phase and magnitude in these representations.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding assumptions about the constancy of coefficients and the definitions of phase and magnitude in the context of varying parameters. The discussion highlights the complexity of transitioning between different mathematical representations without losing critical information.

Natalie Johnson
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am going around in circles, excuse the pun, with phasors, complex exponentials, I&Q and polar form...

1. A cos (ωt+Φ) = Acos(Φ) cos(ωt) - Asin(Φ)sin(ωt)
Right hand side is polar form ... left hand side is in cartesian (rectangular) form via a trignometric identity?

2. But then sometimes I read...
A cos (ωt+Φ) in polar form has corresponding cartesian form of Bcos(ωt)+Csin(ωt), which is fine to understand because this cartesian form gives X and Y coordinates on a cartesian coordinate axes of a vector in that axes.

3. But point 1 and 2 are different, how can Acos (ωt+Φ) in polar represent Bcos(ωt)+Csin(ωt) in cartesian but also be equal to Acos(Φ) cos(ωt) - Asin(Φ)sin(ωt) via a trignometric identity ---> Is it because Acos(Φ) and Asin(Φ) are constants and therefore also B and C? Might be obvious but I need to ask for my own sanity of seeing so much different ways its written.

What about if B and C are not constants due to the phase changing with time Φ(t)?

I am further purplexed by notation used for complex sinusoids.

3. Acos (ωt+Φ) can be represented as the real part of Aei(ωt+Φ)= Acos(ωt+Φ) + iAsin(ωt+Φ)
but from point 1, the right hand side of this equation can be then re-written with the trigometric identity in point 1, expanding it into 4 terms which removes the phase from the argument and giving constants, like in point 3. So why cannot it not be written without the Φ in the argument on the right hand side and use different constants
Aei(ωt+Φ)=Bcos(ωt)+iCsin(ωt)
 
Science news on Phys.org
Start with ##e^{\pm i\omega t}=\cos\omega t\pm i\sin\omega t##,
Now,
$$\begin{align}
e^{i (\omega t+\phi)}& =e^{i\omega t}e^{i\phi}=(\cos\omega t+i\sin\omega t)(\cos\phi +i\sin\phi)\nonumber \\
& =(\cos\omega t~cos\phi-\sin\omega t~sin\phi)+i(\sin\omega t~\cos\phi+\cos\omega t~sin\phi)\nonumber
\end{align}$$Equating real and imaginary parts, gives you two trig identities
$$\cos(\omega t+\phi)=\cos\omega t~cos\phi-\sin\omega t~sin\phi~;~~~\sin(\omega t+\phi)=\sin\omega t~\cos\phi+\cos\omega t~sin\phi$$
You can easily show that $$\cos\omega t= \frac{e^{i\omega t}+e^{-i\omega t}}{2}~;~~~\sin\omega t= \frac{e^{i\omega t}-e^{-i\omega t}}{2i}=-i\frac{e^{i\omega t}-e^{-i\omega t}}{2}.$$
Then,
$$
\begin{align}
A \cos\omega t +B\sin \omega t &=A\frac{e^{i\omega t}+e^{-i\omega t}}{2}-iB\frac{e^{i\omega t}-e^{-i\omega t}}{2}\nonumber \\
& = \frac{(A-iB)e^{i\omega t}}{2} +\frac{(A+iB)e^{-i\omega t}}{2}\nonumber
\end{align}$$
Note that the last expression is real because it is the sum of a number plus its complex conjugate. You can write the complex coefficient in polar form, ##A-iB = re^{i\phi},~r=\sqrt{A^2+B^2}##. In that case,
$$
\begin{align}
A \cos\omega t +B\sin \omega t &= \frac{re^{i(\omega t +\phi)}}{2} +\frac{re^{-i(\omega t +\phi)}}{2}\nonumber\\
& =\sqrt{A^2+B^2}\cos(\omega t+\phi)\nonumber
\end{align}.$$
Note: In the above expression ##\phi = \arctan(B/A)##.
I hope this clarifies things for you and convinces you that the complex exponential plays a pivotal role in trigonometric transformations.
 
Natalie Johnson said:
So why cannot it not be written without the Φ in the argument on the right hand side and use different constants
Aei(ωt+Φ)=Bcos(ωt)+iCsin(ωt)
Can that be right? I would have thought that the magnitude of the left hand side is constant but the magnitude of the right hand side is not (it's an ellipse) unless B=C.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Can that be right? I would have thought that the magnitude of the left hand side is constant but the magnitude of the right hand side is not (it's an ellipse) unless B=C.
I don't think that ##B=C## will do it, but ##A=\sqrt{B^2+C^2}## will.
Suppose ##z = Ae^{i \omega t}=B\cos(\omega t)+iC\sin(\omega t)##, where ##A##, ##B## and ##C## are assumed real.
Then
##|z|^2=(Ae^{i \omega t})(Ae^{-i \omega t})=A^2##
But also
##|z|^2=[B\cos(\omega t)+iC\sin(\omega t)][B\cos(\omega t)-iC\sin(\omega t)]=B^2+C^2##
The two expressions will match if ##A^2=B^2+C^2## as also shown in post #2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
But the phase has been lost. How can varying B and C coefficients achieve an arbitrary phase for the resultant?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K