Consequences of Being Banned on PF Forum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephanus
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Banned members on the PF Forum cannot create threads, post messages, or engage in private chats, as the purpose of banning is to restrict their participation. While some users may see usernames struck out, this indicates a ban, and their previous posts remain visible. The discussion highlights that bans often result from repeated violations of forum rules, not arbitrary decisions. There is a debate about the banning practice, with some suggesting it stifles new ideas, while others defend the policy for maintaining high discussion quality. Overall, the forum prioritizes a high signal-to-noise ratio, which is essential for attracting professionals.
Stephanus
Messages
1,316
Reaction score
104
Dear PF Forum,
I've seen some usernames stroke out. Banned?
Yes, they are.
What are the consequences of being banned?
I've been coresponding with a banned member.
1: Can they create a thread? I don't think so
2: Can they post a message? I don't think so, but can they?
3: Can they chat in private message?
Just want to know :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stephanus said:
1: Can they create a thread? I don't think so
2: Can they post a message? I don't think so, but can they?
3: Can they chat in private message?
They cannot do those things. There would be no point in banning users if they could.
 
mfb said:
They cannot do those things. There would be no point in banning users if they could.
But...
https://www.physicsforums.com/conversations/greeting-for-a-new-member.81103/
If you're staff, you can see my chat.
Hmm.., he's just been a member, and get banned very early.
Perhaps he messaged me just before he gets banned.
 
Stephanus said:
If you're staff, you can see my chat.

I can't. Maybe PF gods like Greg can.
 
Stephanus said:
If you're staff, you can see my chat.
No we cannot.
Greg could access the database, but won't do that unless there are really urgent reasons or unless he is required to do so by law.
Stephanus said:
Perhaps he messaged me just before he gets banned.
Probably.
 
No, no. It's not important. There's nothing private in that chat. Just in case you're curious.
Okay. Because I've seen some member with their names stroke out. I didn't think of it until this Teo Del Fuego has strike in it, but yesterday he hadn't. That's why I search about stroke name.
Ryan42 stroke out, too. I think he/she is clever.

Okayy, mfb. Thanks for your confirmation.
 
jtbell said:
I can't. Maybe PF gods like Greg can.
Nope, it's not important. And I don't intend to report Teo, either. It's just that to prove you that he messaged me before his name stroke out.
 
I think the practice of banning is somewhat rash, understandable as it is to avoid cranks. Greg could soften it a little, I would appreciate if he did so,
as all new ideas can't be presented in Physics Forums, who in this way only permits discussions of old stablished ideas, whithout renovation.
 
Tollendal said:
I think the practice of banning is somewhat rash, understandable as it is to avoid cranks. Greg could soften it a little, I would appreciate if he did so,
as all new ideas can't be presented in Physics Forums, who in this way only permits discussions of old stablished ideas, whithout renovation.

This is false.

PF has many threads that discuss new ideas (have you looked?). It is just that they must first be published in a recognized peer-reviewed journal and NOT simply someone's brainchild that can't even make it into those journals. It takes NO knowledge to spew out "new ideas". How will this add to "renovation" (sic)?

PF has a very high signal-to-noise ratio, which is why it attracts many professionals in various fields. Changing this policy will diminish the very thing that makes PF unique and valuable. Why would we want to do that?

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995, beamie564, jim mcnamara and 8 others
  • #10
Tollendal said:
I think the practice of banning is somewhat rash, understandable as it is to avoid cranks. Greg could soften it a little, I would appreciate if he did so,
Although you may be able to see that a member has been banned you don't have the whole story leading up to the ban because you don't see the removed posts that led to the ban, the private messages we've exchanged with the offender, or the discussion among the mentors.

Except for the unambiguous cases (spambots, obvious and hopeless crackpottery with no interest in listening, personal insults) bans are almost always the result of multiple violations from a member who clearly understands the PF rules but refuses to obey them.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy and berkeman
  • #11
"BANNED" ANALOGY -- What good is a "black hole" if things went both IN and OUT?
 
  • #12
Old Tele man said:
"BANNED" ANALOGY -- What good is a "black hole" if things went both IN and OUT?
But, Hawking Radiation goes out?
 
  • #13
No, Hawking radiation is produced outside.
You can still see posts of banned members, but those are produced before the members are banned. No banned member can make new posts.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy

Similar threads

Replies
66
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
57
Views
7K
Back
Top