I Conservation of angular momentum -- spinning a bicycle wheel in space

AI Thread Summary
In a frictionless environment, a bicycle wheel in space will not stop rotating unless acted upon by an external force. The conservation of angular momentum remains intact as the wheel's friction with the axle causes both to eventually rotate at the same rate, rather than stopping completely. If the wheel is mounted on a non-rotating bike, the torque will cause the bike to rotate, conserving the total angular momentum of the system. Thus, the initial assertion that angular momentum is violated is incorrect. The system continues to exhibit conservation principles as long as no external forces intervene.
abdossamad2003
Messages
68
Reaction score
4
Suppose we have a rotating body like a bicycle wheel in space away from gravity. This body stops after a while due to friction between the wheel and wheel axles. Is not the conservation of angular momentum violated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it's just the wheel, then there's no axle exerting friction and the wheel will rotate without slowing forever. If it is mounted on a non-rotating bike, then the bike will take up the torque and begin rotating, conserving angular momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu and PeroK
abdossamad2003 said:
Suppose we have a rotating body like a bicycle wheel in space away from gravity. This body stops after a while due to friction between the wheel and wheel axles. Is not the conservation of angular momentum violated?
You are wrong to say that the body stops. As per @Halc's answer, the wheel slows and the axle spins up until both are rotating at the same rate. Then the wheel and axle continue to spin eternally, at rest with respect to each other.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top