Conservation of Energy in Friedman Equation

paultsui
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
The first law of thermodynamics states that dU = -PdV + dQ
We can apply this to the expansion of the universe by assuming the expansion of space is a adiabatic process, i.e. dQ = 0. Together with the FW metric, we end up with one of the Friedman Equations: \dot{\rho} = -\frac{3\dot{a}}{a}(p + P/c^{2})

Now let's focus on a cubic region of space. In the case P=0, this means that \dot{\rho} = -\frac{3\dot{a}}{a}(p). This makes sense because this accounts for the fact that when the universe expands, the energy density within get diluted. However, when P != 0, we also have the term -\frac{3\dot{a}}{a}(P/c^{2}). This terms correspond to the -pdV term in the thermodynamics equation. In other words, the energy in the region decreases not just because of dilution, but also because part of the energy is used to "push" the matter outside the region.

My question is, where has the energy that used to "push" the matter outside the region gone? Obviously energy has to be conserved. So the lost energy must have gone to somewhere.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can this be fixed by including a cosmological constant ?

If not, it looks like a case of lack of global energy conservation in GR.
 
What do you mean by including a cosmological constant?
This equation can be obtained by eliminating the cosmological constant from the other two Friedman Equations. So I guess cosmological constant is irrelavant here.

I think this is a local energy conservation problem - we are considering a "small" region in space, where energy flow out of the region to its neighbour.

Please correct me if I am wrong.
 
paultsui said:
What do you mean by including a cosmological constant?
This equation can be obtained by eliminating the cosmological constant from the other two Friedman Equations. So I guess cosmological constant is irrelavant here.
OK.

I think this is a local energy conservation problem - we are considering a "small" region in space, where energy flow out of the region to its neighbour.

Please correct me if I am wrong.
Locally the energy has gone to some neighbours. I guess the divergence of the flow is zero so it must be escaping at the boundary.
 
paultsui said:
Obviously energy has to be conserved.
Unfortunately energy as an integral over a 3-volume cannot even be defined in an expanding universe.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top