Conservation of energy in rotational motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a uniform marble rolling down a symmetric bowl, starting from rest and transitioning between a rough and a frictionless surface. The questions focus on the marble's height on the smooth side, the effects of friction, and energy conservation principles in rotational motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy, questioning how to account for friction in the energy equations. There are inquiries about the implications of the bowl's symmetry and the angular displacement of the marble.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights regarding the role of friction in rolling motion, noting that friction does not perform work when there is no slipping. This has led to further exploration of energy conservation in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the bowl's geometry and the effects of friction on energy calculations. There is an acknowledgment of the initial energy state and how it transforms through the marble's motion.

mit_hacker
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(Q) A uniform marble rolls down a symmetric bowl, starting from rest at the top of the left side. The top of each side is a distance h above the bottom of the bowl. The left half of the bowl is rough enough to cause the marble to roll without slipping but the right half is frictionless.

(a) How far up the smooth side will the marble go, measured vertically from the bottom?

(b) How high up would the marble go if both sides were as rough as the left hand side?

(c) How do you account for the fact that the marble goes higher up with friction on the right side than without friction?



Homework Equations



KE = (1/2)MV^2 + (1/2)IcmW^2.
PE = mgh

The Attempt at a Solution



I am completely blank.
How do I account for the friction on just the right hand side?
Since the bowl is symmetrical, can I take its radius to be h?
Is it ok to say that the angular displacement of the marble is pi/2 from top to bottom?

Pleeeaseeeee help!:cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
initial energy = mgh

bottom of the bowl, energy is (1/2)MV^2 + (1/2)IcmW^2.

relate W to V...

what do you get for V?

when it goes up the frictionless side what happens to the translational energy? what happens to the rotational energy?
 
Friction?

What about friction? Don't we deduct that from the expression

(1/2)MV^2 + (1/2)IcmW^2 to get (1/2)MV^2 + (1/2)IcmW^2 -fD where f is force of friction?

Why don't we take that into account?
 
mit_hacker said:
What about friction? Don't we deduct that from the expression

(1/2)MV^2 + (1/2)IcmW^2 to get (1/2)MV^2 + (1/2)IcmW^2 -fD where f is force of friction?

Why don't we take that into account?

friction only does work when the surfaces slide against each other... in this case it is rolling without any sliding... no energy is lost.

work by friction = frictional force*distance (this is the distance the point of application moves... but in this case there is no slipping, the point of application doesn't move at all... distance = 0).
 
Thanks!

Hey, thanks a ton for that! I never knew that in rolling, friction does not do any work. Again, thanks a ton!:biggrin:
 
mit_hacker said:
Hey, thanks a ton for that! I never knew that in rolling, friction does not do any work. Again, thanks a ton!:biggrin:

no prob. :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K