Marble rolling on ramp harmonic motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a marble rolling without slipping in a spherical bowl, executing simple harmonic motion. The participants are tasked with determining the time it takes for the marble to move from one maximum height to the other, given various answer choices related to the period of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the problem, including the role of torque and forces acting on the marble. There is an exploration of the relationship between angular acceleration and the angle of rotation, with some participants questioning the assumptions made about the forces involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and clarifications regarding the relationships between angular quantities. Some guidance has been offered on deriving the relationship between angular acceleration and the angle of rotation, but no consensus has been reached on the correct answer to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of rotational motion and the implications of rolling without slipping, with specific attention to the definitions and relationships of angular quantities. There is an acknowledgment of the need for careful consideration of kinematics in the context of the problem.

ln(
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A perfectly solid marble of radius R rolls without slipping at the bottom of a spherical bowl of a radius 6R. The marble rolls back and forth in the vertical plane executing simple harmonic motion close to the lowest point. How long does it take the marble to go down one side and up the other from its maximum height to its maximum height?

a) Cannot be determined without knowing amplitude
b) ##\pi \sqrt{\frac{7R}{g}}##
c) ##\pi \sqrt{\frac{7R}{2g}}##
d) ##\pi \sqrt{\frac{7R}{5g}}##
e) ##\pi \sqrt{\frac{5R}{7g}}##

Homework Equations


##\tau_{net} = I\alpha##
##I = 2/5 mR^2## (for sphere)
##F = ma##
##\tau = rFsin\theta##

The Attempt at a Solution


I got answer choice d, but the key says b is correct.
I set up ##\tau_{net} = I\alpha = -fR## where ##f## is the static friction force. I believe gravity does not contribute to the torque, since it acts at the center-of-mass; neither does the normal force since it is always antiparallel to the radius vector from the center of the marble to the point of application. That only leaves the static friction force.
Then, I know that ##F = ma = -mgsin\theta + f \approx -mg\theta + f## tangent to the bowl, using the sine approximation for small theta.
Plugging back into torque net, I get that ##(2/5 mR^2)\alpha = -(ma + mg\theta)R##. Divide by an ##mR## and simplify to get ##7/5 R\alpha = -g\theta##. This means that ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{5g}{7R}}##. Finally I realize that the desired time is half the period and ##T = 2\pi / \omega## so the desired time is ##\pi \sqrt{\frac{7R}{5g}}##, or at least that's what I got.

Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ln( said:
##7/5 R\alpha = -g\theta##.
OK up to here!

Hint: ##\alpha \neq \ddot \theta##.
##\dot \theta## is not the rate of spin of the ball about its center.
Consider the kinematics more carefully. What is the meaning of the angle ##\theta##?
 
TSny said:
OK up to here!

Hint: ##\alpha \neq \ddot \theta##.
##\dot \theta## is not the rate of spin of the ball about its center.
Consider the kinematics more carefully. What is the meaning of the angle ##\theta##?
Hmm.. I think what you're trying to get at is that ##\alpha## isn't directly related to the change in the angle wrt the center of the bowl; rather, it refers to the rotation of the ball. So that means ##\alpha = 5\ddot \theta##?
 
ln( said:
Hmm.. I think what you're trying to get at is that ##\alpha## isn't directly related to the change in the angle wrt the center of the bowl; rather, it refers to the rotation of the ball. So that means ##\alpha = 5\ddot \theta##?
Yes. Can you derive the relation ##\alpha = 5\ddot \theta##?
 
TSny said:
Yes. Can you derive the relation ##\alpha = 5\ddot \theta##?
I made a guess there by thinking about how if the ball rolled through an angle ##\phi## wrt its center of mass, it would trace out an arc ##R\phi##. But then, wrt the center of the bowl, if the angle changed by that same amount the center-of-mass of the marble would trace out an arc ##(6R - R) \phi##. And then I assume this relation holds for the angular accelerations. I'm not sure how to do it rigorously.

EDIT: I think since ##\alpha = a/r## in general, then wrt to the ball's COM ##\alpha = a/R## but wrt to the center of the bowl ##\alpha' = \ddot \theta = a/(5R)##. So ##\alpha = 5\ddot \theta##.
 
Last edited:
ln( said:
I made a guess there by thinking about how if the ball rolled through an angle ##\phi## wrt its center of mass, it would trace out an arc ##R\phi##. But then, wrt the center of the bowl, if the angle changed by that same amount the center-of-mass of the marble would trace out an arc ##(6R - R) \phi##. And then I assume this relation holds for the angular accelerations. I'm not sure how to do it rigorously.
Yes, that's good. Another way is to consider the velocity of the center of the ball ##v_c##. Let ##\phi## represent the angle of rotation of the ball about its center. Write ##v_c## in two different ways: (1) in terms of ##\dot \theta## and (2) in terms of ##\dot \phi##.
upload_2018-1-21_16-24-10.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-21_16-24-10.png
    upload_2018-1-21_16-24-10.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 1,153
TSny said:
Yes, that's good. Another way is to consider the velocity of the center of the ball ##v_c##. Let ##\phi## represent the angle of rotation of the ball about its center. Write ##v_c## in two different ways: (1) in terms of ##\dot \theta## and (2) in terms of ##\dot \phi##.
View attachment 218891
##v_c = 5R\dot \theta = R\dot \phi##.
 
ln( said:
##v_c = 5R\dot \theta = R\dot \phi##.
Yes. I guess that's pretty much the same as your first derivation in terms of arc lengths.
 
ln( said:
EDIT: I think since ##\alpha = a/r## in general, then wrt to the ball's COM ##\alpha = a/R## but wrt to the center of the bowl ##\alpha' = \ddot \theta = a/(5R)##. So ##\alpha = 5\ddot \theta##.
I think you nailed it! :oldsmile:
 
  • #10
TSny said:
I think you nailed it! :oldsmile:
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
4K