Conservation of Momentum of a point particle

AI Thread Summary
A uniform stick of length L and mass M is struck by a point particle of mass m, resulting in an elastic collision where the particle comes to rest. The conservation of momentum leads to the conclusion that the speed V of the center of mass of the stick after the collision is V = (m/M)*v. The discussion also explores energy conservation, noting that the initial kinetic energy of the particle is converted into both translational and rotational motion of the stick. It clarifies that the relationship V = L*w does not apply in this scenario, as the center of rotation is not known. Understanding the distinction between linear momentum and rotational dynamics is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
eprparadox
Messages
133
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A uniform stick of length L and mass M lies on a frictionless horizontal surface. A point particle of mass m approaches the stick with speed v on a straight line perpendicular to one end of the stick and intersects the stick at one end, as shown above (FIGURE ATTACHED). After the collision, which is elastic, the particle is at rest. The speed V of the center of mass of the stick after the collision is

a) (m/M)*v
b) [m/(m+M)]*v
c) Sqrt(m/M)*v
d) Sqrt([m/(m+M)])*v
e) (3m/M)*v



Homework Equations


KEi = KEf
Pi = Pf


The Attempt at a Solution



So I know the answer to this problem is A.

When solving this problem with conservation of momentum, I think you can imagine the ball hitting the center of mass with some speed v and then solve this is as we would any one-dimensional problem. Is that a correct way of thinking about this?

You would then get, mv = MV, which gives V = (m/M)*v.

My real question though is how can we solve it with energy considerations. I know the initial energy is .5*m*v^2 and this goes into rotating the stick and moving it translationally.

So we get .5*m*v^2 = .5*I*w^2 + .5*M*^2
(w = angular velocity of stick)


Can I not say in this instance (as we do for the pure rolling of a ball) that V= L*w? If you do that and then solve for V, you will not come back with (m/M)*v as the answer so it must be wrong, but I don't know why you can't say that.

Any explanations would be great. Thank you very much!
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2010-11-12 at 4.11.46 PM.png
    Screen shot 2010-11-12 at 4.11.46 PM.png
    19 KB · Views: 722
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi eprparadox! :smile:

(have an omega: ω and a square-root: √ and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
eprparadox said:
… After the collision, which is elastic, the particle is at rest. The speed V of the center of mass of the stick after the collision is

When solving this problem with conservation of momentum, I think you can imagine the ball hitting the center of mass with some speed v and then solve this is as we would any one-dimensional problem. Is that a correct way of thinking about this?

yes, linear momentum is conserved (in the 3D case as well as the 1D case) completely separately from rotation
My real question though is how can we solve it with energy considerations. I know the initial energy is .5*m*v^2 and this goes into rotating the stick and moving it translationally.

So we get .5*m*v^2 = .5*I*w^2 + .5*M*^2
(w = angular velocity of stick)

Can I not say in this instance (as we do for the pure rolling of a ball) that V= L*w?

no, v = ωr only applies to rolling (without slipping) … r is the distance from the c.o.m. to the point of contact, and if there is rolling, the point of contact is instantaneously stationary, and therefore it is the centre of rotation, and so the c.o.m. must be moving with speed ωr :wink:

here, you have no idea where the centre of rotation is!

you can only find ω from the energy equation :smile:
 
Hey thank you very much for your response!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top