Conservation of Work and Energy

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 1K views
CivilSigma
Messages
227
Reaction score
58

Homework Statement


Hello, I am having trouble understanding the logic behind the solution to the posted problem. How did they deduce the equation for "Just after impact" ? I don't see how
$$v_y = \sqrt{2g(0.6)}$$

What assumptions did they make or how did they get this simplified equation?

I understand how they got the formula for "Just before impact"

In the y direction:
$$mg(1.6)+0.5m(0)^2 = mg(0)+0.5mv_f^2$$
$$v = \sqrt{2g(1.6)}$$

But I don't see how they applied this formula for "just after impact"

Any guidance is really appreciated.

Thank you for your time.

kMJDUvb.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are applying the formula for motion under constant acceleration because there is a resultant force acting on the plate. It is actually v2=u2+2as
 
So what happened to u2 ? Why is it assumed to be 0 here?
 
sakonpure6 said:

Homework Statement


Hello, I am having trouble understanding the logic behind the solution to the posted problem. How did they deduce the equation for "Just after impact" ? I don't see how
$$v_y = \sqrt{2g(0.6)}$$I understand how they got the formula for "Just before impact"

In the y direction:
$$mg(1.6)+0.5m(0)^2 = mg(0)+0.5mv_f^2$$
$$v = \sqrt{2g(1.6)}$$

Apply the same logic for the energy of the system after collision.
 
u is not assumed to be 0. Look back at the previous diagram and u will know why =)
 
sakonpure6 said:
I understand how they got the formula for "Just before impact"

In the y direction:
$$mg(1.6)+0.5m(0)^2 = mg(0)+0.5mv_f^2$$
$$v = \sqrt{2g(1.6)}$$

But I don't see how they applied this formula for "just after impact"
Use the same equation for conservation of energy mgh+0.5mvy2=constant, but with initial height 0 and velocity unknown and final velocity zero at height 0.6 m.