Conservative vector field problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The vector field defined by ##F(x,y) = (\frac{2xy}{y-\alpha}, 2 - \frac{4x^2}{(y-\alpha)^2})## is conservative when the parameter ##\alpha## equals 4. To verify this, the condition for a conservative vector field, ##rotF=0##, was applied, leading to the conclusion that the field is irrotational. The potential function was derived as ##\phi(x,y) = 2y + \frac{4x^2}{y-4} + g(x)##, but an inconsistency arose when attempting to isolate ##g(x)##, indicating a potential error in the derivation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and their properties
  • Knowledge of conservative vector fields and potential functions
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically partial derivatives
  • Basic concepts of topology, particularly connectedness of domains
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conditions for vector fields to be conservative, focusing on the curl operator
  • Learn about potential functions and their derivation from vector fields
  • Investigate Schwarz's theorem and its implications for second derivatives in vector calculus
  • Explore examples of polar curves and their applications in vector field analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying vector calculus, as well as educators seeking to understand the intricacies of conservative vector fields and potential functions.

Gianmarco
Messages
42
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Determine for which real values of the parameter ##\alpha## the vector field given by
##F(x,y) = (\frac{2xy}{y-\alpha}, 2 - \frac{4x^2}{(y-\alpha)^2})##
is conservative. For those values of ##\alpha##, calculate the work done along the curve of polar equation:
##\rho = \frac{\theta}{\pi}##

Homework Equations


If F is a conservative vector field, then:
##rotF=0##
we can find a potential function ##\phi s.t. \ F=\nabla\phi ##

The Attempt at a Solution


To find the parameter, I calculated the derivative of the first component of the field with respect to y and set it equal to the derivative of the second component with respect to x to show that the vector field is irrotational (I don't know if I can do that since the domain of the field is not simply connected and so schwarz' theorem for second derivatives doesn't apply). Either way, I found the plausible result that ##\alpha = 4##.
Since the vector field is conservative, I tried to find the potential function by integrating the second component ##2 - \frac{4x^2}{(y-\alpha)^2}## with respect to y.
This gives ##\phi(x,y) = 2y + \frac{4x^2}{y-4} + g(x)##
By deriving it with respect to x and equating it with the first component of the field, I got ##\frac{8x}{y-4} + g'(x) = \frac{2xy}{y-4}## which leads to ##g'(x) = \frac{2xy+8}{y-4}##.
This makes no sense because g(x) should be a function of x only and since I've proven that the field is conservative for that value of ##\alpha##, I should be able to find a potential function. Am I wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gianmarco said:

Homework Statement


Determine for which real values of the parameter ##\alpha## the vector field given by
##F(x,y) = (\frac{2xy}{y-\alpha}, 2 - \frac{4x^2}{(y-\alpha)^2})##
is conservative. For those values of ##\alpha##, calculate the work done along the curve of polar equation:
##\rho = \frac{\theta}{\pi}##

Homework Equations


If F is a conservative vector field, then:
##rotF=0##
we can find a potential function ##\phi s.t. \ F=\nabla\phi ##

The Attempt at a Solution


To find the parameter, I calculated the derivative of the first component of the field with respect to y and set it equal to the derivative of the second component with respect to x to show that the vector field is irrotational (I don't know if I can do that since the domain of the field is not simply connected and so schwarz' theorem for second derivatives doesn't apply). Either way, I found the plausible result that ##\alpha = 4##.
Since the vector field is conservative, I tried to find the potential function by integrating the second component ##2 - \frac{4x^2}{(y-\alpha)^2}## with respect to y.
This gives ##\phi(x,y) = 2y + \frac{4x^2}{y-4} + g(x)##
By deriving it with respect to x and equating it with the first component of the field, I got ##\frac{8x}{y-4} + g'(x) = \frac{2xy}{y-4}## which leads to ##g'(x) = \frac{2xy+8}{y-4}##.
This makes no sense because g(x) should be a function of x only and since I've proven that the field is conservative for that value of ##\alpha##, I should be able to find a potential function. Am I wrong?
Error in the very last step: ##\frac{8x}{y-4} + g'(x) = \frac{2xy}{y-4}## doesn't lead to ##g'(x) = \frac{2xy+8}{y-4}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gianmarco
Samy_A said:
Error in the very last step: ##\frac{8x}{y-4} + g'(x) = \frac{2xy}{y-4}## doesn't lead to ##g'(x) = \frac{2xy+8}{y-4}##.
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K