Constant solutions to the Lagrange equations of motion

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
bobred
Messages
170
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle moves on the surface of an inverted cone. The Lagrangian is given by

t%29%5Cdot%7Br%7D%5E%7B2%7D+r%5E%7B2%7D%5Cdot%7B%5Cphi%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%5Cright%29-mg%5Calpha%20r.png


Show that there is a solution of the equations of motion where
png.latex?r.png
and
png.latex?%5Cdot%7B%5Cphi%7D.png
take constant values
png.latex?r_0.png
and
png.latex?%5COmega.png
respectively

Homework Equations


The equations of motion
png.latex?r.png
and
png.latex?%5Cphi.png
are

tex?%5Cddot%7Br%7D+%5Calpha%5E%7B2%7D%5Cddot%7Br%7D-r%5Cdot%7B%5Cphi%7D%5E%7B2%7D+g%5Calpha%20=0.png
(1)

png.latex?r%5E2%5Cdot%7B%5Cphi%7D=K.png
(2)

So
png.latex?%5Cdot%7B%5Cphi%7D.png
can be eliminated from equation (1)

The Attempt at a Solution


Would I go about this by setting
png.latex?%5Cddot%7Br%7D.png
equal to a constant,
png.latex?r_0.png
, and similarly for
png.latex?%5Cdot%7B%5Cphi%7D.png
?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
bobred said:
Would I go about this by setting
png.png
equal to a constant,
png.png
, and similarly for
png.png
?

It is not [itex]\ddot{r}, \dot{\phi}[/itex] that you were asked to show provide a solution, but [itex]{r}, \dot{\phi}[/itex]. These requirements define uniform circular motion. The question is thus asking you to use the equations to check that uniform circular motion is a solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bobred
MarcusAgrippa said:
It is not [itex]\ddot{r}, \dot{\phi}[/itex] that you were asked to show provide a solution, but [itex]{r}, \dot{\phi}[/itex]. These requirements define uniform circular motion. The question is thus asking you to use the equations to check that uniform circular motion is a solution.

If ##r(t) = r_0## (a constant), what is ##\ddot{r}(t)##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bobred
What do you get when you differentiate a constant?
 
Differentiating a constant is zero.
I was thinking about the equations in isolation to each other and not as part of a system. So

[tex]v=r \dot{\phi}=r_0 \Omega[/tex]

I just need to show that the equations of motion lead to this.
 
Last edited:
bobred said:
Differentiating a constant is zero.
I was thinking about the equations in isolation to each other and not as part of a system. So

[tex]v=r \dot{\phi}=r_0 \Omega[/tex]

I just need to show that the equations of motion lead to this.

No: they do not "lead to" this; they merely allow this.

There is a big difference, since (due to the lack of friction) a solution with non-constant ##r## and ##\dot{\phi}## never settles down to a limiting orbit of constant ##r## and ##\dot{\phi}##. However, if you start off with the correct initial conditions, your orbit maintains constant ##r## and ##\dot{\phi}## forever. Essentially, that is what you are being asked to verify.
 
So setting the acceleration [itex]\ddot{r}=0[/itex] leaves a constant [itex]r[/itex] and [itex]\dot{\phi}[/itex] which allows the uniform motion.