Construct a Device to Move Across a Wire

  • Thread starter Thread starter eucalegon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Device Wire
Click For Summary
The project involves constructing a device that can efficiently move across two parallel wires, spaced 14.5 cm apart and positioned seven feet above the ground, using only one motor and a battery of 3 volts or less. Proposed designs include using wheels connected by a metal rod, with one wheel on each wire, and utilizing a 1.5-volt battery for optimal power without excessive weight. Suggestions also include hanging the motor and battery below one wire while transferring motion to a rubber wheel above. There is a consensus that using a single wire may be more advantageous than utilizing both. The discussion emphasizes the importance of efficiency and creativity within the given constraints.
eucalegon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have to build a device that can move across a wire. There are two parallel wires, both very thin, 14.5 cm apart, seven feet above the ground, and we have to move the device the length of the classroom on the wire as fast as possible. We are allowed one motor, one 3 Volt or less battery, and we can use one wire or both wires. Also, no legos or building toys allowed.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I was thinking of having wheels, connected by a metal rod, lie across the two wires, one wheel resting on each wire. The motor would touch the outside of one of the wheels, so both of the wheels would move. Also, it would be good to use a 1.5 Volt battery because it gives a lot of power but it is not too heavy? . . .
Please post your suggestions!
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd just hang the battery and motor below one wire, and transfer the rotational motion to a single rubber wheel above the wire (that the motor and battery are hanging from). I don't see any advantage to using two wires.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K