Constructing a Function g: R2→R Limiting x→a but not Limiting ||x||→||a||

  • Thread starter Thread starter renolovexoxo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
renolovexoxo
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I hope this is in the right place, it feels like calculus, but it's the last part of my analysis problem.

Construct an example where g: R2->R lim x->a g(x) exists but lim ||x||->||a|| g(x) does not exist

I'm having a very hard time coming up with something to put this together. I think this is my theory behind it, does anyone have any ideas on something that would work?

Specify a continuous functiong(x ⃗ )= g(x,y) on R^2, which is not constant, and which cannot be strictly written as a function of r = √(x^2+y^2 ). Then, the limit of g(x ⃗ ) as x ⃗ approaches a ⃗,a constant vector,will exist (and will equal g(a ⃗ ) ), but the limit of g(x ⃗ ) as |x ⃗ |approaches |a ⃗ | (a constant positive number) will not exist because x ⃗ can approach many different values in R2 (and still have|x ⃗ |approach |a ⃗ |), but the values that g(x ⃗ ) approach will be different.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apart from constant functions, basically everything not too complicated works.
Write down the easiest non-constant function you can imagine, chances are good that it is an example you can use.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top