Constructing a Homeomorphism for Homogeneous Topological Spaces

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around constructing a homeomorphism for the interval (-1, 1) that maps any point a within that interval to 0. The goal is to demonstrate that (-1, 1) is a homogeneous topological space, which requires showing the existence of a homeomorphism between any two points in the space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various functions that could serve as homeomorphisms, including linear functions and parabolas. Some express concerns about the properties of these functions, particularly regarding their ability to maintain the openness of sets. Others explore the idea of constructing piecewise functions to achieve the desired mapping.

Discussion Status

There are multiple lines of reasoning being explored, with some participants suggesting specific functions and others questioning their validity. A few participants have proposed a piecewise function approach, and there is acknowledgment of the need to demonstrate the homogeneity of the space through the existence of homeomorphisms between arbitrary points.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of ensuring that the proposed functions are bijections and maintain the properties required for homeomorphisms. There is also mention of the need to avoid functions that could lead to half-open sets, which would violate the conditions for homeomorphisms.

madness
Messages
813
Reaction score
69

Homework Statement



For any a \in \left( -1,1 \right) construct a homeomorphism f_a: \left( -1,1 \right) \longrightarrow \left( -1,1 \right) such that f_a\left( a \right) = 0. Deduce that \left( -1,1 \right) is homogeneous.

Homework Equations



Definition of a homogeneous topological space, ie that the exists a homeomorphism for each pair of points x,y which maps x to y.

The Attempt at a Solution



I can't find a set a functions which map an arbitrary point to zero and is surjective. My attemps include f = x - a, f = |x - a|, f = sin (x-a) but these are not homeomorphic for arbitrary a.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are lots of such homeomorphisms. Examples:

1) join two straight lines that have different slopes (not necessarily equal to one);

2) use the points (-1, -1), (a, 0), and (1, 1) to pin down a parabola (I think this works, haven't worked the details).
 
I'd be careful with the parabola idea, since if it actually has a peak in that interval, then it won't take open sets to open sets, but will take any open set that contains the x-value for the axis of symmetry to a half-open set.
 
LumenPlacidum said:
I'd be careful with the parabola idea, since if it actually has a peak in that interval, then it won't take open sets to open sets, but will take any open set that contains the x-value for the axis of symmetry to a half-open set.

Yes, that's why I said that I think it works. I drew some sketches that make it appear that the max/mins occur outside the interval, but I didn't solve any equations. My sketches could be misleading me.

Obvious choices of line segments in my example 1) give obvious homeomorphisms.
 
Can you explain what you mean by joining lines? Are you talking about intersecting lines in R^2?
 
madness said:
Can you explain what you mean by joining lines? Are you talking about intersecting lines in R^2?

Yes.

What are A and B such that f_a \left( x \right) = Ax + B has

\lim_{x \rightarrow -1} f_a \left( x \right) = -1

and f_a \left( a \right) = 0?
 
Last edited:
Right so you have a line starting at the point (-1,-1) and intersecting at (a,0). Unfortunately it does not finish at (1,1), and so it cannot be a bijection from the interval
(-1, 1) to (-1,1). Is this not right?
 
It can be a bijection so long as the lines are both increasing or both decreasing.
 
Sorry I must be confused here. I can only see one line other than the interval (-1, 1). I thought you were talking about a line crossing the real axis at the point a.
 
  • #10
madness said:
Right so you have a line starting at the point (-1,-1) and intersecting at (a,0). Unfortunately it does not finish at (1,1), and so it cannot be a bijection from the interval
(-1, 1) to (-1,1). Is this not right?

So pick another line from (a,0) to (1,1), and turn f_a into a "schizophrenic" function.
 
  • #11
ok so I have for x < a f_a \left( x \right) = \frac{x-a}{1+a}

and for x > a f_a \left( x \right) = \frac{x-a}{1-a}

Which coincide at x = a. Looks good to me.
 
  • #12
madness said:
ok so I have for x < a f_a \left( x \right) = \frac{x-a}{1+a}

and for x > a f_a \left( x \right) = \frac{x-a}{1-a}

Which coincide at x = a. Looks good to me.

Looks good if an equality is included for at least one of x < a, x > a.

The question is not done yet, though. You still need to show the deduction that gives that (-1, 1) is a homogeneous space.
 
  • #13
I know I was just thinking about that. I need to show that for any x,y in the domain, there is a homeomorphism mapping x to y. Presumably I can somehow use the function I just made, but simple addition of y onto this function doesn't make a homeomorphism.
 
  • #14
madness said:
I know I was just thinking about that. I need to show that for any x,y in the domain, there is a homeomorphism mapping x to y. Presumably I can somehow use the function I just made, but simple addition of y onto this function doesn't make a homeomorphism.

Unfortunately, I know only how to give a very small hint, or a very large hint (writing down the answer). Small hint: since both x and y are arbitrary elements of (-1 , 1), you should try things that have both x and y as indices.

Maybe someone else knows a better hint that doesn't give the whole answer away.
 
  • #15
How about this:

f_b \left( b \right) = 0, f_a^{-1} \left( 0 \right) = a, f_a^{-1} \left( f_b \left( b \right)\right) = a?

So that for any a,b we have a homeomorphism (i think) mapping b to a.
 
  • #16
madness said:
How about this:

f_b \left( b \right) = 0, f_a^{-1} \left( 0 \right) = a, f_a^{-1} \left( f_b \left( b \right)\right) = a?

So that for any a,b we have a homeomorphism (i think) mapping b to a.

Yes, that's it. :smile:

I might switch the and b around in one of the places, i.e., either "So that for any b,a we have a homeomorphism," or f_b^{-1} \left( f_a \left( a \right)\right) = b <br />.
 
  • #17
Ok thanks that's the problem solved!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K