Construction of an affine tensor of rank 4

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on constructing two affine tensors of rank 4, denoted as Cijkl and Dijkl, based on the components Bij of an affine tensor of rank 2. The identities established are ∑k ∑l Cijkl Bkl = Bij + Bji and ∑k ∑l Dijkl Bkl = Bij - Bji. The solution involves using the Kronecker delta, specifically Cijkl = δik δjl + δil δjk, to derive the required identities. This exercise is sourced from "Tensors, Differential Forms, and Variational Principles" by Lovelock and Rund, specifically Problem 2.7.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of affine tensors and their properties
  • Familiarity with Kronecker delta notation
  • Knowledge of tensor contraction operations
  • Basic concepts of symmetric and antisymmetric tensors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of affine tensors in advanced mathematics
  • Learn about tensor contraction and its implications in physics
  • Explore symmetric and antisymmetric tensors in detail
  • Read "Tensors, Differential Forms, and Variational Principles" by Lovelock and Rund for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying advanced tensor calculus, particularly those interested in applications in theoretical physics and differential geometry.

Whitehole
Messages
128
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


In En the quantities Bij are the components of an affine tensor of rank 2. Construct two affine tensors each of rank 4, with components Cijkl and Dijkl for which

kl Cijkl Bkl = Bij + Bji

kl Dijkl Bkl = Bij - Bji

are identities.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


Can anyone give me a hint on how to start? I just don't know how to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whitehole said:

Homework Statement


In En the quantities Bij are the components of an affine tensor of rank 2. Construct two affine tensors each of rank 4, with components Cijkl and Dijkl for which

kl Cijkl Bkl = Bij + Bji

kl Dijkl Bkl = Bij - Bji

are identities.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


Can anyone give me a hint on how to start? I just don't know how to start.
Maybe the first post of this old thread can help you on the way: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/isotropic-tensors.106292/
 
Whitehole said:
The link in the first post in that thread is broken. Can you help me by just giving a hint?
There is no link in the first post of that thread.
The tensor mentioned in the first post of that thread was the hint, more specifically ##\delta_{ab}\delta_{cd}##.
 
Samy_A said:
There is no link in the first post of that thread.
The tensor mentioned in the first post of that thread was the hint, more specifically ##\delta_{ab}\delta_{cd}##.
This is what I did,

Let Cijkl = δik δjl + δil δjk

Multiply both sides by Bkl then take the sum

kl Cijkl Bkl = ∑klik δjl Bkl + δil δjk Bkl)

Then from the dirac delta in the first term k=i and l=j, as for the second term l=i and k=j

Thus ∑kl Cijkl Bkl = Bij + Bji

The same process goes for the second question. Is this correct?
 
Whitehole said:
This is what I did,

Let Cijkl = δik δjl + δil δjk

Multiply both sides by Bkl then take the sum

kl Cijkl Bkl = ∑klik δjl Bkl + δil δjk Bkl)

Then from the dirac delta in the first term k=i and l=j, as for the second term l=i and k=j

Thus ∑kl Cijkl Bkl = Bij + Bji

The same process goes for the second question. Is this correct?
Yes, that's what I meant.
 
Samy_A said:
Yes, that's what I meant.
Oh, thanks! But what does that relation mean?
 
Whitehole said:
Oh, thanks! But what does that relation mean?
I don't know. Contraction of a rank 2 tensor with C gives a symmetric rank 2 tensor. Contraction of a rank 2 tensor with D gives an antisymmetric rank 2 tensor.
Whether is means something, and if so, what it means, I don't know.

Was this an exercise, or is this used somewhere in a theoretical context?
 
Samy_A said:
I don't know. Contraction of a rank 2 tensor with C gives a symmetric rank 2 tensor. Contraction of a rank 2 tensor with D gives an antisymmetric rank 2 tensor.
Whether is means something, and if so, what it means, I don't know.

Was this an exercise, or is this used somewhere in a theoretical context?
Yes this is an exercise in Tensors, Differential Forms, and Variational Principles by Lovelock and Rund. Problem 2.7. Thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K