Contemporary issues in crit safety?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tehfrr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Issues Safety
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a renewed interest in nuclear engineering, specifically in criticality safety, as the author begins their MS studies. There is a perception that criticality safety may not have many new developments, but the community faces ongoing challenges, especially with the anticipated increase in new reactor applications. OSU has received a grant from the NRC to develop new courses, including one focused on criticality safety, utilizing tools like SCALE and Sliderule. The author is also exploring new reactor designs, such as the MSR, indicating that research opportunities still exist in the field. Overall, criticality safety remains a relevant and evolving area within nuclear engineering.
tehfrr
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
After a brief venture over into the medical/RHP side of things, I find myself drawn back into nuclear engineering. Glad it happened before I got too deep into something else! I've just started working on my MS, and I am trying to find some sort of direction for myself. Anyways, one subset of nuclear engineering that really captures my interest is criticality safety. I am somewhat under the impression that there isn't a whole lot of new things happening in this area, and its all pretty well known. Is this assumption correct? Or are there still interesting challenges facing the crit safety community?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
OSU just received a grant from the NRC to develop new classes for the NRC in anticipation of the projected increase in applications for new licenses over the next 15 years or so. One of the classes being offered next quarter is criticality safety. We'll be using SCALE and Sliderule (and possibly MCNPX) for the class. As for new things happening, I'm sure the new reactors being designed are in need of research. One of my classes right now is looking at the MSR. Since there aren't a lot of students in the class, we've pretty much skipped over I&C.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Back
Top