Continue solutions of ODEs around the origin

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) that are separable, resulting in solutions of the forms x(z)=Cz^{1/2} and x(z)=De^{1/z}. A confusion arises when evaluating x(ze^{2\pi i}), where a teaching assistant asserts that the evaluation leads to different results based on the chosen branch of the square root function. The principal branch yields a positive result, while the branch used in the book leads to a negative output, clarifying the discrepancy. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding branch cuts in complex analysis when dealing with singular points in differential equations. Understanding these branches resolves the confusion regarding the differing solutions.
psie
Messages
315
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
Solve the following equations when ##z## is real and positive. How will the solutions change if continued one revolution around the origin in the positive direction? a) ##2zx'-x=0## and b) ##z^2x'+x=0##.
Relevant Equations
By "continued one revolution around the origin", they basically mean evaluate ##x(ze^{2\pi i})##.
What confuses me is that my solution differs from that given in the answers at the back of the book.

Solving the ODEs is fairly simple. They are both separable. After rearrangement and simplification, you arrive at ##x(z)=Cz^{1/2}## for a) and ##x(z)=De^{1/z}## for b). In both solutions, ##C## and ##D## are positive constants.

Then I'm asked to evaluate ##x(ze^{2\pi i})## and a TA claims that ##x(ze^{2\pi i})=C(ze^{2\pi i})^{1/2}=Cz^{1/2}e^{\pi i}=-Cz^{1/2}## for a) and that ##x(ze^{2\pi i})=De^{1/(ze^{2\pi i})}=De^{1/z}## for b). This is also the answer given in the back of the book. I agree for b), but for a), why isn't it true that ##x(ze^{2\pi i})=C(ze^{2\pi i})^{1/2}=C(z\cdot1)^{1/2}=Cz^{1/2}##?

Edit: This problem appears in a section on differential equations with singular points, i.e. where the matrix ##A(z)## in the corresponding system ##x'(z)=A(z)x(z)## has a singularity.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Which branch of the square root are you using? In the principal branch, \arg z \in (-\pi, \pi] and \arg z^{1/2} = \frac12 \arg z \in (-\pi/2, \pi/2] so that \operatorname{Re}(z^{1/2}) \geq 0. However, in the branch in which \arg z \in (\pi, 3\pi] then \arg z^{1/2} = \frac12 \arg z \in (\pi/2, 3\pi/2] so that \operatorname{Re}(z^{1/2}) \leq 0. e^{0i} is not in this branch, but e^{2\pi i} is.

In both cases, \sqrt{re^{i\theta}} = r^{1/2}e^{i\theta/2} with r^{1/2} \geq 0.
 
Right, a branch...I forgot! I guess the book uses the latter branch, i.e. for which ##\arg z \in (\pi, 3\pi]##, since they input a real positive number and get a negative positive number. It makes more sense now. Thank you.
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...