Continuity of a Function with Inverse Preimage Condition

  • Thread starter Thread starter fraggle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the continuity of a function f: X → Y under the condition that for every open set U in Y containing f(x), the preimage f^(-1)(U) is open in X. This condition indeed implies that f is continuous. The reasoning is that if U does not intersect the image f(X), then f^(-1)(U) is the empty set, which is open. Additionally, this definition of continuity aligns with the epsilon-delta definition and the closed set condition, reinforcing the equivalence of these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of function continuity in topology
  • Familiarity with open and closed sets in metric spaces
  • Knowledge of the epsilon-delta definition of continuity
  • Basic concepts of preimages and images of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of continuity in detail
  • Explore the relationship between open sets and continuity in topology
  • Learn about closed sets and their implications for function continuity
  • Investigate the concept of preimages in the context of different types of functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis or topology, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts of continuity and preimages in functions.

fraggle
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose f:X-->Y
suppose for each open set U in Y s.t U contains some element f(x), we have f^(-1)(U) is open in X.
Does this imply f is continuous

Homework Equations


U is not quite an arbitrary open set of Y since there could be an open set of Y that does not interesct the image f(X).
Suppose V is such a set.
Then can we say f^(-1)(V)= the empty set? Or is it just undefined?

This isn't a homework question, just curious.



The Attempt at a Solution


I believe it is continuous since, otherwise the proof I'm reading in a textbook wouldn't work (they just ommited this part).

Could anyone explain the reasoning for this?
thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right since if the open set U didn't contain the image of any point in X, then f-1(U) would be empty (since nothing in X was mapped to U), and the empty set is an open set. So they are just excluding that case since it doesn't really carry any information with it.

Also, this version of continuity is equivalent to the epsilon-delta definition of continuity, as well as a few other versions. For example, if for every closed set in Y, f inverse of that closed set is closed in X, then f is continuous. You can prove it from the above statement by taking complements.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K