Local Formulation of Continuity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity Local
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the local formulation of continuity in topological spaces, specifically addressing the continuity of a function ##f : X \to Y## given that ##f|_{U_i}## is continuous on a collection of open sets ##\{U_i\}## that cover ##X##. The proof demonstrates that for any point ##x \in X## and an open neighborhood ##V## of ##f(x)##, there exists an open set ##\mathcal{O}## in ##X## such that ##f(\mathcal{O}) \subseteq V##, confirming the continuity of ##f##. Participants discuss the need to explicitly show that ##f^{-1}(V)## is open to complete the proof, highlighting the importance of different formulations of continuity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of topological spaces
  • Knowledge of continuity in the context of functions between topological spaces
  • Familiarity with open sets and neighborhoods
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and logic
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of open sets in topology
  • Learn about different formulations of continuity in topological spaces
  • Explore the relationship between local and global continuity
  • Investigate the implications of continuity on inverse images of open sets
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of continuity in topological spaces.

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Let ##X## and ##Y## be topological spaces, and let ##\{U_i\}## be a collection of open sets in ##X##. If ##X = \bigcup U_i## and ##f|_{U_i}## is continuous, then ##f : X \to Y## continuous.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Let ##x \in X##, and let ##V \subseteq Y## be some open nbhd of ##f(x)##. Then there exists an ##i## such that ##x \in U_i##. Since ##f_{U_i}## is continuous, there exists a set ##\mathcal{O}## that is open in ##U_i## and contains ##x## such that ##f|_{U_i}(\mathcal{O}) \subseteq V##. But as ##U_i## is open in ##X##, so must ##\mathcal{O}##; moreover, ##f(\mathcal{O}) = f_{U_i}(\mathcal{O})## holds since ##\mathcal{O}## is completely contained in ##U_i##. Therefore, ##f## must be continuous.

How does that sound?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There seem to be some steps missing. What is needed is to show that ##f^{-1}(V)## is open. There are some deductions in the above proof that may relate to that, but nothing that explicitly reaches that conclusion - ie 'closes the deal'.
 
Well, I am working with a different formulation of continuity:

For each ##x \in X## and each neighborhood ##V \subseteq Y## of ##f(x)##, there is a neighborhood ##U## of ##x## such that ##f(U) \subseteq V##.

Perhaps that makes a difference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K