Continuity question in Topology

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a metric space (X,d) and a function f: X->X that is claimed to be continuous under certain conditions related to Lipschitz continuity. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the requirement to prove continuity when it is already stated as a condition, and the implications of the parameter M in relation to contractive functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to demonstrate that Lipschitz maps are continuous, noting that contractions are a specific case. Questions arise about the interpretation of the problem, particularly regarding the assumption of continuity and the application of the epsilon-delta definition.

Discussion Status

Some participants are providing guidance on how to approach the proof using the epsilon-delta definition of continuity. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the conditions given in the problem, with multiple interpretations being considered.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted ambiguity regarding the definition of continuity in the context of the problem, particularly with respect to the parameter M and the nature of the function f. The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on how to interpret the requirements of the proof.

zilla
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let (X,d) be a metric space, M a positive number, and f: X->X a continuous function for which:

d(f(x), f(y)) is less than or equal to Md(x,y)

for all x, y in X. Prove that f is continuous. Use this to conclude that every contractive function is continuous.


The Attempt at a Solution



It seems intuitively obvious that f is continuous, but there are a couple of things throwing me off on this one. First, it's asking about concluding that contractive functions are continuous, but this isn't by definition a contractive function that we're looking at since M >1 is a possibility. And second, the problem 'gives' that f is continuous and then asks you to prove that f is continuous. Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the problem is asking you to show that Lipschitz maps are continuous. Contractions are a special case of Lipschitz maps, so the result follows when you show the first propety. You are not supposed to assume f is continuous.

Use the epsilon delta definition of continuity. Write out the inequality with M. From this, can you choose a delta, perhaps involving M, to satisfy the continuity condition? After you have tried to find this delta, consider uniform continuity.
 
Last edited:
VeeEight said:
I think the problem is asking you to show that Lipschitz maps are continuous. Contractions are a special case of Lipschitz maps, so the result follows when you show the first propety. You are not supposed to assume f is continuous.

Use the epsilon delta definition of continuity. Write out the inequality with M. From this, can you choose a delta, perhaps involving M, to satisfy the continuity condition? After you have tried to find this delta, consider uniform continuity.

Could you elaborate on what you mean by the 'first property'?

Also, so I'm looking for |f(x) - f(y)| < Epsilon?
 
Thanks for the help - I appreciate it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K