The discussion focuses on proving the continued fraction representation of √2, expressed as √2 = 1 + 1/(2 + 1/(2 + ...)). Participants clarify the terminology, noting that "continued" fraction is the correct term. The conversation involves algebraic manipulation, specifically transforming the expression x = 1 + 1/(2 + 1/(2 + ...)) to derive a relationship involving x. The participants confirm that the transformation leads back to the original expression, illustrating a common mathematical technique. Overall, the thread emphasizes the process of proving the continued fraction representation of √2.