Continuous functions have closed graphs

Click For Summary
The theorem "Continuous functions have closed graphs" is examined in the context of general topological spaces, with a focus on its validity when mapping from a space X to a Hausdorff space Y. The discussion highlights the importance of the Hausdorff property for ensuring the uniqueness of limits, which is crucial for proving that a continuous map has a closed graph. It is noted that if Y is not Hausdorff, there exists a continuous function from X to Y whose graph is not closed. The conversation also touches on the conditions under which the converse of the closed graph theorem holds, suggesting that the equivalence of closed graphs and Hausdorff spaces is not surprising. Overall, the relationship between continuity, closed graphs, and the Hausdorff property is central to the discussion.
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32

Homework Statement


How is the theorem "Continuous functions have closed graphs" proven in the setting of a general topological space? (assuming the theorem is still valid?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I found a 6 months old thread in which the OP asks help to prove that a continuous map from a topological space X to a Hausdorff space Y has a closed graph

(https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=171861&highlight=closed+graph)

I haven't been able to prove this version either though. I suppose it deals with sequences and the Hausdorff property is there to ensure the uniqueness of a limit, but I'm not familiar enough with sequence theory in general topological spaces to construct an argument.
 
Last edited:
I am interested in the converse to the closed graph theorem.

The closed graph theorem says "E and F Banach, and T linear with a closed graph. Then T is continuous."

Very restrictive. Under which conditions is the converse true? I have shown that for a map T btw metric spaces, "T continuous ==> T has a closed graph". But I'm sure it holds under weaker hypotheses!
 
I just scribbled some stuff down, and I think I managed to prove that if Y isn't Hausdorff, then there exists a topological space X and a continuous map f:X->Y whose graph isn't closed. So, provided what I did was alright (and I think it is - it wasn't a very intricate argument, but based on nets), this means that saying "the graph of any continuous function from X to Y is closed" is equivalent to saying "Y is Hausdorff".

I don't think this is very surprising. There are a few other results of a similar flavor, e.g. a space is Hausdorff iff its diagonal is closed, a Hausdorff space is metrizable iff its diagonal is a zero set, etc.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K