Contour Integration and Residues: Solving Complex Integrals for Summation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a complex integral using contour integration techniques, specifically focusing on the function involving poles and singularities. The integral is defined around a large circle that avoids certain singularities, and participants are tasked with relating this to the evaluation of specific infinite sums.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the identification of poles in the function and the implications of contour integration for evaluating the integral. There is confusion about transitioning from the contour integral to the summation of residues. Questions arise regarding the relationship between the sums of residues from different sets of poles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the reasoning behind the relationships between the residues and the contour integral. Some guidance has been offered regarding the evaluation of residues and the conditions under which the contour integral approaches zero as the radius increases.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of understanding complex analysis and contour integration, with specific attention to the behavior of integrals as the contour radius approaches infinity. There is an emphasis on ensuring that the contour avoids singularities and the implications of this for the evaluation of infinite sums.

Airsteve0
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the integral of the function (1) around a large circle of radius R>>b which avoids the singularities of (e^{z}+1)^{-1}. Use this result to determine the sum (2) and (3).


Homework Equations



(1) - f(z) = \frac{1}{(z^2-b^2)(e^z+1)}
(2) - \sum\frac{1}{(2n+1)^2+a^2} from 1 to ∞
(3) - \sum\frac{1}{(2n+1)^2} from 1 to ∞

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand the basics of contour integration and using residues to evaluate them; however, with this particular question I am lost at where I should start. I think that the contour should be a circle obvioulsy but going from the contour to the summation has me confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Airsteve0 said:

Homework Statement



Consider the integral of the function (1) around a large circle of radius R>>b which avoids the singularities of (e^{z}+1)^{-1}. Use this result to determine the sum (2) and (3).

Homework Equations



(1) - f(z) = \frac{1}{(z^2-b^2)(e^z+1)}
(2) - \sum\frac{1}{(2n+1)^2+a^2} from 1 to ∞
(3) - \sum\frac{1}{(2n+1)^2} from 1 to ∞

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand the basics of contour integration and using residues to evaluate them; however, with this particular question I am lost at where I should start. I think that the contour should be a circle obvioulsy but going from the contour to the summation has me confused.

The idea is that your function has poles at z=(2n+1)*pi*i for all n and at z=b and z=(-b). For large circle which avoids those singularities the contour integral will equal the sum of the residues of those poles times (2*pi*i). Now if you can argue that as R->infinity the contour integral goes to zero, then the infinite sum of (2n+1)*pi*i residues will be equal to minus the sum of the residues from the b and -b poles. That's how you get a formula for an infinite sum.
 
why is it that the the sum of the residues of one set of poles is equal to minus the sum of the other?
 
Airsteve0 said:
why is it that the the sum of the residues of one set of poles is equal to minus the sum of the other?

Because if the value of contour integral goes to zero as R->infinity then the sum of all of the residues must go to zero. If you split them into two sets then the sum of those two sets must be zero.
 
ah ok, thanks I will see what I can do
 
Airsteve0 said:
ah ok, thanks I will see what I can do

Good luck! The residue part is actually not that hard. Do that first. Be careful with the argument that you can find contours whose integral goes to 0 as R goes to infinity. I thought that was the hardest part.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K