Contour integration by parametisation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poirot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Poirot
Messages
87
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Determine, by explicit parameterisation,

C dz f(z), where f(z) = z^n , n ∈ Z, n > 0
and C is the line segment from z = 0 to z = 2 together with the line segment from z = 2 to z = 2 + i.

Homework Equations


ϒ f(z) dz = ∫ab dt f(ϒ(t))ϒ'(t) where ϒ'(t)≈dz/dt

The Attempt at a Solution


Splitting C into two sub contours ϒ1 = {z=x, x ∈ [0 , 2]} and ϒ2 = {z=y, y ∈ [2 , 2+i]}. Then using the equation above to integrate over both and sum. This gave and answer which I really can't gauge whether is correct or not.

(2+i)(n+1)/(n+1)

But my lecturer gave us a rough check guide and said that if what you start with is a real number then your answer should be real also. Thus am skeptical of my answer.

Any help on the method, answer or general help with this would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Poirot said:

Homework Statement


Determine, by explicit parameterisation,

C dz f(z), where f(z) = z^n , n ∈ Z, n > 0
and C is the line segment from z = 0 to z = 2 together with the line segment from z = 2 to z = 2 + i.

Homework Equations


ϒ f(z) dz = ∫ab dt f(ϒ(t))ϒ'(t) where ϒ'(t)≈dz/dt

The Attempt at a Solution


Splitting C into two sub contours ϒ1 = {z=x, x ∈ [0 , 2]} and ϒ2 = {z=y, y ∈ [2 , 2+i]}. Then using the equation above to integrate over both and sum. This gave and answer which I really can't gauge whether is correct or not.

(2+i)(n+1)/(n+1)

But my lecturer gave us a rough check guide and said that if what you start with is a real number then your answer should be real also. Thus am skeptical of my answer.

Any help on the method, answer or general help with this would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!
It's not clear what your lecturer was talking about, or if you have fully understood what he said, but I have never heard of such a "rough check" on open contour integrals.

In fact, a similar problem is contained in this article (pp. 4-5) where f(z) = z2 and the contour is dog-legged like the one for your problem:

https://math.dartmouth.edu/archive/m43s12/public_html/notes/class6.pdf

The calculation starts out with a real result on C1 and gives a complex result on C2 with a net result which is complex. :wink: