Find, using complex contour integrals, the function f(x)....

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a Fourier transform using complex contour integrals, specifically focusing on the function whose Fourier transform is given as f~(p) = 1/(a² + p²). Participants are exploring the use of residue theorem and contour integration techniques to derive the original function f(x).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the contour integral and the identification of poles, particularly focusing on the semicircular contours in the complex plane. There are attempts to verify the conditions under which the integral over certain contours approaches zero as the radius goes to infinity. Questions arise regarding the behavior of the integrand for different values of x and the implications for contour choice.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the conditions necessary for the integral to converge, particularly emphasizing the role of the exponential term in the integrand. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of different contour choices based on the sign of x, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of ensuring that the radius R is sufficiently large and the implications of the sign of x on the choice of contour. There are references to potential mistakes in notes regarding the bounds of the integrals, which are under scrutiny.

Poirot
Messages
87
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


whose Fourier transform is f~(p) = 1/(a2 + p2)

Homework Equations


f(x) = 1/√2π ∫-∞ eipx f~(p)

The Attempt at a Solution


First of all I let f(z) = eixz/(z2 + a2)
and γ = γ1 + γ2
with the ϒ's parametrised by:

γ1 : {z=t, -R<t<R}
γ2 : {z=Reit, 0<t<π}
(So a semicircle of radius R)

In this contour the only pole that lies inside is the z= +ia
so using Cauchy's residue theorem:
ϒf(z)dz = 2πi (Res(f, z=ia))
I found the residue of z=ia to be Rez(f,z=ia)= -i e-ax/2a
So ∫ϒf(z)dz= π e-ax/a

And I have something in my notes about the fact you have to check that the integral of f(z) on γ2 goes to zero as R goes to infinity, which I vaguely understand because we actually want the integral from -∞ to +∞.
So the checks I have in my notes are:
Suppose γ has length L and on γ |f(z)|<M
Then |∫γf(z)dz|≤M⋅L
With γ ≡ {z=γ(t), a≤t≤b}
L = ∫abdt|γ'(t)|
On γ2: |z| =R
Using ||a|-|b|| ≤ |a+b| ≤ |a|+|b|
R2-a2 ≤ |z2+a2| ≤ R2+a2
So 1/R2-a2 ≥ 1|z2+a2| ≥ 1R2+a2
Therefore |∫γ2f(z)dz|≤πR/(R2-a2)
So ∫γ2f(z)dz → 0 as R → ∞
as you have |∫γ2 f(z)dz| ≤ e-Rxsin(t)/(R2 - a2)

and if x ≥0 the exponent is, at most, equal to 1, but if x<0, it blows up and we need a different contour for x<0.

Let γ = γ1 + γ3
with ϒ3 : {z=Reit, π<t<2π}

so a semicircle in the negative part, and this time it's a clockwise contour so Cauchy's residue must carry a minus sign on the right hand side.

So doing everything as before I found ∫ϒ = πeax/a

But I'm having trouble with the checks, I found that the inequality for the modulus of the integral over ϒ3 comes out the same? So effectively it still blows up?

But I know this is the right answer I just can't follow through with the checks.

I appreciate this is quite long, but a lot of it is just background to set the scene, and I think I just have a lack of understanding of the checks and just know the procedure.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Poirot said:
So the checks I have in my notes are:
Suppose γ has length L and on γ |f(z)|<M
Then |∫γf(z)dz|≤M⋅L
With γ ≡ {z=γ(t), a≤t≤b}
L = ∫abdt|γ'(t)|
On γ2: |z| =R
Using ||a|-|b|| ≤ |a+b| ≤ |a|+|b|
R2-a2 ≤ |z2+a2| ≤ R2+a2
So 1/R2-a2 ≥ 1|z2+a2| ≥ 1R2+a2
Therefore |∫γ2f(z)dz|≤πR/(R2-a2)
So ∫γ2f(z)dz → 0 as R → ∞
as you have |∫γ2 f(z)dz| ≤ e-Rxsin(t)/(R2 - a2)

and if x ≥0 the exponent is, at most, equal to 1, but if x<0, it blows up and we need a different contour for x<0.
Looks like your notes have some mistakes. Assume ##R>a## since you're going to make the circle big in th end. You showed ##\left\lvert \frac{1}{z^2+a^2} \right\rvert \le \left\lvert \frac{1}{R^2-a^2} \right\rvert##, so you can say
$$\left\lvert \frac{e^{izx}}{z^2+a^2} \right\rvert \le \left\lvert \frac{e^{izx}}{R^2-a^2} \right\rvert.$$ On the semicircle, you have ##z=R\cos\theta + iR\sin\theta##, so ##\lvert e^{izx} \rvert = \lvert e^{ixR\cos\theta}e^{-xR\sin\theta} \rvert = e^{-xR\sin\theta}##. Hence, an upper bound on the integrand is ##M = \frac{e^{-xR\sin\theta}}{R^2-a^2}##. With ##L=\pi R##, you get
$$\left\lvert \int_{\gamma_2} \frac{e^{izx}}{z^2+a^2} \right\rvert \le \frac{\pi R e^{-xR\sin\theta}}{R^2-a^2}$$ where ##0<\theta<\pi##.

Consider the exponential. What combinations of ##\theta## and ##x## cause it to go to 0 in the limit ##R \to \infty##?
 
vela said:
Looks like your notes have some mistakes. Assume ##R>a## since you're going to make the circle big in th end. You showed ##\left\lvert \frac{1}{z^2+a^2} \right\rvert \le \left\lvert \frac{1}{R^2-a^2} \right\rvert##, so you can say
$$\left\lvert \frac{e^{izx}}{z^2+a^2} \right\rvert \le \left\lvert \frac{e^{izx}}{R^2-a^2} \right\rvert.$$ On the semicircle, you have ##z=R\cos\theta + iR\sin\theta##, so ##\lvert e^{izx} \rvert = \lvert e^{ixR\cos\theta}e^{-xR\sin\theta} \rvert = e^{-xR\sin\theta}##. Hence, an upper bound on the integrand is ##M = \frac{e^{-xR\sin\theta}}{R^2-a^2}##. With ##L=\pi R##, you get
$$\left\lvert \int_{\gamma_2} \frac{e^{izx}}{z^2+a^2} \right\rvert \le \frac{\pi R e^{-xR\sin\theta}}{R^2-a^2}$$ where ##0<\theta<\pi##.

Consider the exponential. What combinations of ##\theta## and ##x## cause it to go to 0 in the limit ##R \to \infty##?
The only thing I can think of at the moment is if θ is -θ then the sin(-θ)= -sin(θ) so we'll have the extra minus sign and for x<0 this works? but I'm not sure how to word it and/or if that's right?
Thank you for taking the time to help by the way, greatly appreciated :)!
 
I think you have it. If ##x>0##, you need ##\sin\theta>0## to make the sign of the exponent negative. That's why you close the contour in the upper half plane. If ##x<0##…
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K