MHB Contraction mapping (Maryam Ishfaq's question at Yahoo Answers)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contraction Mapping
AI Thread Summary
A contraction mapping T on a metric space is proven to be a continuous mapping due to its Lipschitz condition. Specifically, if T satisfies the Lipschitz condition with a constant K, then it can be shown that T is uniformly continuous. By choosing an appropriate delta in relation to epsilon, the continuity of T follows. Since a contraction is a special case of a Lipschitz mapping where K is less than 1, it inherently possesses continuity. Thus, every contraction mapping is confirmed to be continuous in the context of metric spaces.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Maryam Ishfaq,

The result is more general. Suppose $(E,d)$ is a metric space and $T:E\to E$ is a Lipschitz mapping, i.e. there is a positive constant $K$ such that $d(T(x),T(y))\le Kd(x,y)$ for all $x,y\in E$. Then, for all $\epsilon >0$ and choosing $\delta=\epsilon/K:$ $$d(x,y)<\delta \Rightarrow d(T(x),T(y))\le Kd(x,y)<K\frac{\epsilon}{K}\Rightarrow d(T(x),T(y))<\epsilon$$ This means that every Lipschitz mapping is uniformly continuous, as a consequence continuous. But a contraction map is a Lipschitz mapping with $K<1$, hence every contraction is a continuous mapping.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top