Contribution to margin movement

  • Thread starter Thread starter Analyze
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Margin Movement
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the contribution of individual sales to the overall margin increase from 20% to 35%, resulting in a margin delta of 1500 basis points. The initial sales data includes three transactions with varying profits, and the goal is to determine how much each sale contributed to the 15% increase in margin. The solution involves calculating the percentage increase of each sale relative to the original margin and weighting these contributions based on their share of total sales. Ultimately, the breakdown shows that each sale contributes differently to the overall margin increase, with specific calculations yielding contributions of 0.025, 0.5, and 0.225 for the respective sales. The discussion concludes with the realization that the initial confusion was resolved through detailed calculations and clarifications.
Analyze
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm stumped at how to approach this problem and was hoping someone could enlighten me.

If I had sold $100 of a product and made a 20% profit up until a specific day.

The next day, made three sales;
A) $20 making a $5 profit
B) $50 making a $30 profit
C) $30 making a $15 profit.

So now, in total, I've sold $200 worth making a total profit $70 or a margin of 35%.

The margin delta of 1500 bps, is there a way to show what each sale contributed to that. E.g. A) -300bps B)1000 bps and C) 800bps. I've tried isolating each sale but I don't want order to be a factor.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Analyze said:
I'm stumped at how to approach this problem and was hoping someone could enlighten me.

If I had sold $100 of a product and made a 20% profit up until a specific day.

The next day, made three sales;
A) $20 making a $5 profit
B) $50 making a $30 profit
C) $30 making a $15 profit.

So now, in total, I've sold $200 worth making a total profit $70 or a margin of 35%.

The margin delta of 1500 bps, is there a way to show what each sale contributed to that. E.g. A) -300bps B)1000 bps and C) 800bps. I've tried isolating each sale but I don't want order to be a factor.

"The margin delta of 1500 bps" -- what does this mean? I have no idea where the 1500 comes from, and I don't know what bps stands for.
 
Sorry, Mark, thanks for your reply.

Margin delta meant the change in the margin. Moving from having a 20% profit margin before the day to a 35% profit margin at the end of the day, the change is 15% or 1500 basis points (bps).

Hope this makes it clearer.
 
IF I understand "basis points", then you have "$100 of a product and made a 20% profit", "$20 making a $5 profit" which is 25%, "$50 making a $30 profit" which is 60%, and " $30 making a $15 profit" which is 50%.

That is, as you say, a total of $200 dollars sales so a weighted average of the percentage profits, weighted by share of sales, would be
\frac{100}{200}(20)+ \frac{20}{200}(25)+ \frac{50}{200}(60)+ \frac{30}{200}(50)= 10+ 2.5+ 15+ 7.5= 35. In terms of "percent" that is 10%+ 2.5%+ 15%+ 7.5%= 35%. In terms of "basis points", it is 1000+ 250+ 1500+ 75= 3500.

The four sales would be allocated as 1000, 250, 1500, and 75 bps.
 
That's great, thank you. The point I'm trying to get to is one step further though I'm afraid.

From the first sale, we had a 20% margin. After the fourth, we had a 35% profit. The delta here, 15%, how do I work out the make up of that?

If I was to do weighting a of 20/100*25 , 50/100 *60 and 30/100 * 50 then I get 50% which follows. However, I want to know what amount of the 15% increase is attributable to each sale so I could say for example! sale 2 contributed 2.5% of the increase, sale 3 contributed 7.5% and sale 4 contributed 5% effectively showing the make up of the 15% increase.

My hunch is that I'd need to find a weighted average of each sales percentage difference from our starting block e.g. Sale2 made 10% more than the first and was 1/5th of the increase but I know I'm missing something.

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
I've actually worked this out now, my question was quite far from the solution.

The increase from 20% to 35% is a 75% increase. The breakdown of the 75% is made up as follows.

For sale 2, it made a 25% profit which is 5% more than the original 20% or a 25% increase. ((.25-.2)/2). The weighting of that sale to the total is 20/200 which is equal to .1. Multiply the .1 by .25 to get .025 which is the contribution to the .75 increase.

Repeat for sale 3 and 4 to get .5 and .225 respectively and check by adding them all to get .75

Thank you both for looking at my question and giving it a go, apologies I wasn't clear initially, I hadn't really thought through how I was going to present the data.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top